Well that is very interesting. He cites two articles. He doesn’t link to either one of them. Then he makes a bunch of claims that are not in those articles, but those are the only things he listed as sources for the information he’s giving you. I mean that’s just really bad journalism. He supposedly is an “award winning“ journalist. What awards? When? Given by whom? Just curious. Also I would imagine anyone else would want those questions answered before they believed one fucking thing out of this guy‘s mouth. He May well be telling the truth. But this isn’t good journalism. An award-winning journalist doesn’t fail to link his sources and then doesn’t make claims that those very sources aren’t making in the articles he cited. That’s not just poor journalism, it’s suspiciously bad.