Even just one month ago I was 100% convinced that the election was stolen. But then I start to see what people are touting as “scientific proof”, and questions begin to develop. I see the errors in logic and statistics, I see the exaggerations and the grand declarations that I normally only see from people who are trying to hype up a lie. And now, all of a sudden, I’m having serious doubts about my original assumptions. I still do believe the election was stolen, but I’ve never seen a group of intelligent people do a worse job of presenting their evidence. This is proof? I mean wow. No it’s not. Not even close to proof. How about you present the information and allow the people to decide from selves if this is “proof.“ Again, I normally only see charlatans who exaggerate and beat their chests like this. Proof? This? No, it’s very compelling. There are also plenty of holes and plenty of questions. This isn’t nearly as airtight as they think it is. And I find that to be concerning.