Strawman argument
You have FAILED to back up your false claim that Poal is a Pro-Censorship site. It appears that your teachers have successfully turned off your mind and stuffed your head full of Alinsky tactics as a substitute for logic and reason.
>Strawman argument
You have FAILED to back up your false claim that Poal is a Pro-Censorship site. It appears that your teachers have successfully turned off your mind and stuffed your head full of Alinsky tactics as a substitute for logic and reason.
You are stating that AOU removed someone who annoyed him and this is FALSE. He clearly stated that the user was banned for using multiple accounts with the same ip. At this point you are straight up LYING, because you know that your claim of Poal being a Pro-Censorship site is false.
The correct and proper thing to do would be to simply admit that you were wrong and apologize, but I highly doubt that you have the courage and integrity to be a man and do so.
You are stating that AOU removed someone who annoyed him and this is FALSE. He clearly stated that the user was banned for using multiple accounts with the same ip. At this point you are straight up LYING, because you know that your claim of Poal being a Pro-Censorship site is false.
The correct and proper thing to do would be to simply admit that you were wrong and apologize, but I highly doubt that you have the courage and integrity to be a man and do so.
(post is archived)