Oh, the ad hominems. Very constructive, indeed!! I asked you for evidence and you provide only your opinion. That's NOT evidence. You are projecting yourself on them when you provide no evidence.
You don't know what an ad hominem is.
I made my points very clearly, then I insulted you, which is perfectly logical. This is the difference between someone who actually has an education and someone who only learned to mimic the sounds.
I provided photographic evidence for something that was only peripheral to my argument. Even if they are not jews, they are still guilty and have publicly confessed to their crimes and you have not refuted that WHATSOEVER.
You're an idiot.
"Even if they are not jews, they are still guilty....."
Now we are getting some where. You have stated you have no real evidence. It is only your opinion, which IS legitimate as long as you are stating it as an opinion and not as fact. Carry on. By the way:
Ad hominem, adjective, from Latin: literally, “to a person”. Attacking an opponent's character or motives rather than answering the argument or claim.
>Attacking an opponent's character or motives rather than answering the argument or claim.
I answered your claim and I also attacked your character, which is pure demonstrably pure shit. You are a dishonest little weasel.
We are not getting anywhere, as it was not central to my argument. It's an irrelevant point that you siezed upon in a desperate red herring attempt. Despite that, I provided photographic evidence, to which you provided more putrid hot air from your well ridden farthole.
You sir, are a fucking joke. There is no way that this anything but a troll account.
(post is archived)