WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

667

i was shopping on amazon and found this : https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07VZ2W7L4/ref=ods_gw_d_dc_aucc_my_ds

Yes this is old news but it is the exact same photo of the Mickey Mouse Clock Q posted...

I don't know if this is still relevant today, but i thought it interesting enough to share

i was shopping on amazon and found this : https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07VZ2W7L4/ref=ods_gw_d_dc_aucc_my_ds Yes this is old news but it is the exact same photo of the Mickey Mouse Clock Q posted... I don't know if this is still relevant today, but i thought it interesting enough to share

(post is archived)

I stated this is "OLD news. "

I stated " I don't know if this is still relevant today, but i thought it interesting enough to share" ( the photo)

I shared the photo because it is the same photo Q posted. ... Nothing beyond that..

Think about that for a second...

Youre still thinking about an Amazon Mickey mouse clock some random dude posted a picture of years ago.

Again you take out of context and miss direct.... and you failed again...

i was shopping on amazon and found this : https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07VZ2W7L4/ref=ods_gw_d_dc_aucc_my_ds

Yes this is old news but it is the exact same photo of the Mickey Mouse Clock Q posted

Explain to me the misdirection and out of context accusation of my comment about yours.