Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

In the fall of 2020, Trump's Department of Offense Secretary Mark Esper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark A. Milley decided that two female generals should be promoted to elite, four-star commands. But the two Pentagram leaders feared that any candidates other than White men might be viewed as "political correctness" and hence, replaced with other candidates by the White House. The account given in this Slimes article -- now essentially confirmed by the post-election resurfacing of these two bossy masculine females -- explains the game that was played behind Trump's back by Esper and Milley:

"The Pentagon officials agreed on an unusual strategy: They held back their recommendations until after the November elections, betting that if Biden won, he would be more supportive of the Pentagon picks than Mr. Trump. They stuck to the plan even after Mr. Trump fired Mr. Esper six days after the election.

The strategy may soon pay off. In the next few weeks, Mr. Esper’s successor, Lloyd J. Austin III, and General Milley are expected to send the delayed recommendations to the White House, where officials are expected to endorse the nominations and formally submit them to the Senate."

The two affirmative-action shrews, Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost of the Air Force and Lt. Gen. Laura J. Richardson of the Army, will easily be approved for their 4th Star under Biden.

Editor: People who say that Trump was a failure or that Q was a "psyop" simply do not appreciate how deep the Deep State really is, and how corrupted and insane our society has become. What did Trump really ever have to work with?

https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-02192021---rats-in-the-military.html

In the fall of 2020, Trump's Department of Offense Secretary Mark Esper and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs Gen. Mark A. Milley decided that two female generals should be promoted to elite, four-star commands. But the two Pentagram leaders feared that any candidates other than White men might be viewed as "political correctness" and hence, replaced with other candidates by the White House. The account given in this Slimes article -- now essentially confirmed by the post-election resurfacing of these two bossy masculine females -- explains the game that was played behind Trump's back by Esper and Milley: "The Pentagon officials agreed on an unusual strategy: They held back their recommendations until after the November elections, betting that if Biden won, he would be more supportive of the Pentagon picks than Mr. Trump. They stuck to the plan even after Mr. Trump fired Mr. Esper six days after the election. The strategy may soon pay off. In the next few weeks, Mr. Esper’s successor, Lloyd J. Austin III, and General Milley are expected to send the delayed recommendations to the White House, where officials are expected to endorse the nominations and formally submit them to the Senate." The two affirmative-action shrews, Gen. Jacqueline D. Van Ovost of the Air Force and Lt. Gen. Laura J. Richardson of the Army, will easily be approved for their 4th Star under Biden. Editor: People who say that Trump was a failure or that Q was a "psyop" simply do not appreciate how deep the Deep State really is, and how corrupted and insane our society has become. What did Trump really ever have to work with? https://www.realhistorychan.com/anyt-02192021---rats-in-the-military.html

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

But unfortunately right now it does look like that Trump was a failure and Q was a "psyop" and yes the Deep State is deep. That is what happens when you don't arrest anyone guilty for 4 years and just wait for the "correct timing" and trust Sessions.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Let’s be fair. They also retardedly trusted Barr.

[–] • 1 pt

This is Comedy Gold. A couple of suckass generals who never got their hands dirty outsmarted POTUS you say?

[–] • 0 pt

Or would Trump have agreed with the 4th star for them and , oh the humanity , gotten credit for promoting the women?

It is far more logical to think Q was a psyop (and a damn good one) than to think the deep state is just to big. If justice had been begun year 2 or 3 it would have grown like a snowball rolling downhill. Once a few people were charged and their futures threatened to be behind bars they would have sung. Others would have sought deals etc... Alas we got a well done nothing burger.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

I love when people have to resort to “look what Trump was up against” while defending him and saying that he wasn’t a failure. Then why are you pointing out what he was up against? Because he succeeded?

He’s the one who said he was going to drain the swamp. We didn’t ask him, he volunteered that. He offered to do it.

If I am going to do something difficult, like run a marathon or climb a mountain, and I do not succeed, it doesn’t matter that it was hard. That doesn’t mean I wasn’t a failure. Just because it’s hard to run a marathon doesn’t mean I succeeded in running it even if I failed to finish it. I failed. Sure, I can keep training and try again later, but my attempt was a failure.

But what else do I expect from Q anon and blind Trump supporters who care more about excusing his failure than what’s better for our republic. They literally change the meaning of words to accommodate his failure. Because that’s what it was: a failure.