When Q+ was POTUS he declassed all of this... This is a key
as for retired Generals
They can only state what has already been publicized . ( They can also state what they are authorized to ) .
Remember Q has sent messages to us through Flynn before ..... Remember Flynns " Oath" ect etc ...
Q has used Gen Mcinerney to give us info several times in tthe past as well,
this is one example: . "The capitol attack" this is same Gen that told us SF were imbedded with Antifa in that raid and the SF took Pelosi Lap Top He is WH
All that said Absolutely the DS Playbook
Rather, the purpose is to provide their 'official' interpretation of this already public information. Again, they cannot provide any classified information. They can however, provide DISINFO along with their interpretation of it. Do you see how the Deep State uses 'Retired' government officials to 'salt' the news? Buyer Beware.
The key is knowing the Generals. Flynn is not the manner of man Brennan is not even close ( Thank God )
Follow the drops do your research . trust yourself.
You basically reiterated what I said.
"( They can also state what they are authorized to )."
When you said "authorized", this means under special assignment and under contract. I mentioned this earlier. They are given guidelines and parameters to what can be said and publicized. An earpiece is often used to keep the contracted individual within parameters. They don't get to publicize classified information though. This isn't a willy-nilly topic. The amount of steps to declassify information is tremendously involved.
"The key is knowing the Generals."
It's too bad you and I don't know the Generals. Seeing them on TV and in some interview is not knowing them. Define stranger.
Gen McInerney stating Pelosi's laptop was taken by SF can be just as much DISINFO as any other 'Retired' Intel official providing 'insider' information. If you think in terms of cui bono, why would Gen McInerney even state this? Who benefits? My thoughts on this is it was DISINFO to get Pelosi and her team to collaborate and overreact. I bet the COMMS and COINTEL were perked up right after McInineney's mentioning. If SF took really took it, wouldn't one want to hide this fact? Not mentioning anything about the stolen laptop would keep it in the context of the mob stealing it. There's a very different reason for McInerney for publicising this. And my guess is that it was DISINFO.
" They can only state what has already been publicized " . Your words not mine.....
Now you agree with me when i added AUTHORIZED .. The key is knowing the Generals. I love it when you tell me I don't know any General..
I have met many generals in my life time. I have 20 years service in the US army , One of many positions i have held is advisor to the commander. At the Brigade level that is a General whom I work for and with. yes many i know are worthless DS Actors.. but there are many who are not...
Quit misdirecting and taking out of context my words.
" I love it when you tell me I don't know any General.."
These are your words not mine. I imagine you may know some..... very possible...
"Now you agree with me when i added AUTHORIZED"
Yes, I was only assuring that it meant under the call for a special assignment/contract under guidelines and parameters to what can be said and publicized.
"I have met many generals in my life time. I have met many generals in my life time. I have 20 years service in the US army,..."
Let's cut to the chase here and be direct. Are you personal friends with General McInerney? If you are personal friends with General McInerney, then you know him. By the way, you forgot to define Stranger. Also defining IFF (Identify, Friend, or Foe) is key to what I am saying. I use to drive Admirals to their destinations overseas. There are plenty stories there. That doesn't change the context of my point, which I will reiterate:
"My thoughts on this is it was DISINFO to get Pelosi and her team to collaborate and overreact. I bet the COMMS and COINTEL were perked up right after McInineney's mentioning. If SF took really took it, wouldn't one want to hide this fact? Not mentioning anything about the stolen laptop would keep it in the context of the mob stealing it. There's a very different reason for McInerney for publicising this.** And my guess is that it was DISINFO."**
Now this is my interpretation. I don't have ANY fact to back it up. It just very plausible to me. We should be good-to-go here. Cheers.
I have 20 years service in the US army, One of many positions i have held is advisor to the commander. At the Brigade level that is a General whom I work for and with.
Uhuh. Everybody in here has at least 20 years in military service, the vast majority in service as top advisor to brigade-level commanders. We are each also recognized as experts in the fields of nuclear physics, neuro-surgery, quantum biology, and mixed martial arts.
The point being, your claimed gravitas earns you zero credibility with the rest of us.
(post is archived)