My thoughts on any 'retired' military, CIA FBI, and any other alphabet agency is to NOT believe any so-called 'INTEL' or 'inside information' they publicize. There is a reason why these people are in the public eye.
From this interview, we learn a little insight to who General McInerney is. He stated at the 14:33 minute mark reading from the whistle-blower affidavit and referring to Justice Roberts, "There's nothing wrong with being gay". So, there we have General McInerney's position on gays. This makes me think that General McInerney might not be 'conservative'. He is definitely not Naturalistic, but rather upholds an unnatural lifestyle.
I find 'retired' General McInerny being interviewed by 'retired' ex-CIA Michael Scheuer on Ryan Dark Knight peculiar and it is a reoccurring theme used by the DC swamp. Ask yourself, why are these 'retired' government officials front-and-center in the public domain? How did General McInerny suddenly appear on the scene? Why not some other military member? Another sleeper asset awoken? Are these people really retired? Or are they under 'contract' for DISINFO purposes? The best way to fight the opposition is to control the opposition -- Vladimir Lenin
These 'retired' officials cannot provide ANY classified information due to them signing a Non-Disclosure Agreement when they retire. When government official that had access to classified information retires, it is not a simple matter of just putting in your 2-weeks resignation. There is a very involved process of assuring the classified information they were privy to is not ever disclosed. The paper work for addressing this is lengthy.
What are these 'Retired' government officials actually putting out there in the public domain then? They can only state what has already been publicized. You and I can read the same information they read. Rather, the purpose is to provide their 'official' interpretation of this already public information. Again, they cannot provide any classified information. They can however, provide DISINFO along with their interpretation of it. Do you see how the Deep State uses 'Retired' government officials to 'salt' the news? Buyer Beware.
When Q+ was POTUS he declassed all of this... This is a key
as for retired Generals
They can only state what has already been publicized . ( They can also state what they are authorized to ) .
Remember Q has sent messages to us through Flynn before ..... Remember Flynns " Oath" ect etc ...
Q has used Gen Mcinerney to give us info several times in tthe past as well,
this is one example: . "The capitol attack" this is same Gen that told us SF were imbedded with Antifa in that raid and the SF took Pelosi Lap Top He is WH
All that said Absolutely the DS Playbook
Rather, the purpose is to provide their 'official' interpretation of this already public information. Again, they cannot provide any classified information. They can however, provide DISINFO along with their interpretation of it. Do you see how the Deep State uses 'Retired' government officials to 'salt' the news? Buyer Beware.
The key is knowing the Generals. Flynn is not the manner of man Brennan is not even close ( Thank God )
Follow the drops do your research . trust yourself.
You basically reiterated what I said.
"( They can also state what they are authorized to )."
When you said "authorized", this means under special assignment and under contract. I mentioned this earlier. They are given guidelines and parameters to what can be said and publicized. An earpiece is often used to keep the contracted individual within parameters. They don't get to publicize classified information though. This isn't a willy-nilly topic. The amount of steps to declassify information is tremendously involved.
"The key is knowing the Generals."
It's too bad you and I don't know the Generals. Seeing them on TV and in some interview is not knowing them. Define stranger.
Gen McInerney stating Pelosi's laptop was taken by SF can be just as much DISINFO as any other 'Retired' Intel official providing 'insider' information. If you think in terms of cui bono, why would Gen McInerney even state this? Who benefits? My thoughts on this is it was DISINFO to get Pelosi and her team to collaborate and overreact. I bet the COMMS and COINTEL were perked up right after McInineney's mentioning. If SF took really took it, wouldn't one want to hide this fact? Not mentioning anything about the stolen laptop would keep it in the context of the mob stealing it. There's a very different reason for McInerney for publicising this. And my guess is that it was DISINFO.
" They can only state what has already been publicized " . Your words not mine.....
Now you agree with me when i added AUTHORIZED .. The key is knowing the Generals. I love it when you tell me I don't know any General..
I have met many generals in my life time. I have 20 years service in the US army , One of many positions i have held is advisor to the commander. At the Brigade level that is a General whom I work for and with. yes many i know are worthless DS Actors.. but there are many who are not...
Quit misdirecting and taking out of context my words.
Gen McInerney has been on Dave Janda's program several times the past several years discussing the corruption going on in the Gov. and military.
Thanks.
Your statement is true. To this day I raise the red flag in concern of the Navy Seal who stated he killed Osama bin Laden. Never should this information been given out.
(post is archived)