Honestly, this was a great, very thought provoking post! I was halfheartedly following this Q movement for the past year and a half. I honestly thought is was just a political or military insider sharing information.
1. How was Q able to post in 2017 (in present tense) about things happening in 2020? I have yet to get a serious answer on this. Either he was throwing enough SXXt on the wall to see what sticks or he was getting information from the future which seems far fetched.
2. Flynn said 1. there is no plan 2. the insurrection as was not signed 3. the military is NOT in charge What more do people need to see or hear? Who on this board knows the plan( or lack thereof) better than him? GodsAngell? Lakotapride?
--- My thoughts on any 'retired' military, CIA FBI, and any other alphabet agency is to NOT believe any INTEL or inside information they publicize.
As soon as I stated this [from my earlier response]. I find 'retired' General McInerny was interviewed (brighteon.com) by ex-CIA Michael Scheuer on Ryan Dark Knight. Ask yourself, why are these 'retired' government officials front-and-center in the public domain? Are they really retired? Or are they under contract for DISINFO purposes? These 'retired' officials cannot provide any classified information due to their Non-Disclosure agreement, so what are they putting out there in the public domain? They can only state what is already been publicized. You and I can read the same thing they read. Their purpose is to provide their interpretation of this public information. Again, they cannot provide any classified information. They can provide DISINFO along with their interpretation of it. Do you see how the Deep State uses 'retired' government officials to 'salt' the news?
Basically all of what you wrote conjures my thought, and underscores it, of 'Q' being an absolute enigma. I wouldn't know how to go about answering any of your questions above (under 2.) .... It's an enigma.
General Flynn stating this should be taken with a grain of salt. Why would he admit any of it if true? This is most likely plausible deniability. As I mentioned before, parts of the 'Q' posts were never meant for us. The COMMS were encrypted jibberish. 'Q' had admitted DisInfo was necessary. This indicates there indeed was DISINFO in his posts. Again, not any one of us can provide any indication and extent of the DISINFO. I don't believe it was meant for us, but we participated as being collateral. We happen to be residents of the pond and the surrounding environment to which the stage is set for drawing in the enemy. It's like a duck caller with his decoys calling in ducks. To any of us, the hunter's duck call is a duck. This is what Irregular Warfare is.
The game is still being played. Only the environment has changed. The Irregular Warfare is now focused elsewhere. My thoughts on any 'retired' military, CIA FBI, and any other alphabet agency is to NOT believe any INTEL or inside information they publicize. General Flynn falls in this category too. I don't know why people think these 'retired' INTEL people can provide us any classified information. They can't. Their retirement pensions depend on a Non-Disclosure clause. The penalty of violating it is a felony and the loss of their pension. If a retired official is convicted of any felony, they lose their pension. So, all these talking heads out there on TV are really categorized falling under the Editorial page or Opinion page of a newspaper. This leads me to my original question (to you), which I think I have summarily gathered enough information to answer it myself.
(post is archived)