"This is highly misleading at best," Dale insisted. "The bill would require states to accept ballots that were post-marked on or before Election Day and then arrived up to 10 days after the election, but it would not require states to accept ballots that were mailed after Election Day and then arrived up to 10 days later. So you couldn’t mail, six, seven days later, have it arrive on day 10, and have it accepted.”
Weren't there LOTS of issues with states accepting mail-in ballots after election day that did not have a postmark? I seem to recall the USPS not postmarking and/or back-dating postmarks as an issue in some states/districts.
> "This is highly misleading at best," Dale insisted. "The bill would require states to accept ballots that were post-marked on or before Election Day and then arrived up to 10 days after the election, but it would not require states to accept ballots that were mailed after Election Day and then arrived up to 10 days later. So you couldn’t mail, six, seven days later, have it arrive on day 10, and have it accepted.”
Weren't there LOTS of issues with states accepting mail-in ballots after election day that did not have a postmark? I seem to recall the USPS not postmarking and/or back-dating postmarks as an issue in some states/districts.
Exactly Patriot, I seem to remember allegations of telling then to back date ballots also.
Exactly Patriot, I seem to remember allegations of telling then to back date ballots also.
(post is archived)