2.7 million Trump votes deleted nationwide.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (13).

[–] • 0 pt

"For the millionth time. We believe this happened."

Enough is enough. You've only mentioned this 997,984 times. Quit exaggerating. :)

"Show us what you have."

With the courts, including SCOTUS, having proverbially 'locked-their-doors' to hearing any of the election fraud evidence, I tend to think Powell and company are holding onto their cards for the right moment. I don't know when or what marks that 'right' moment though. I just know in a grand game like this you better play your cards right. You don't get a second chance. Who knows maybe it has already slipped away. I don't know their mindset. I just know lawyers look to act in a very specific way for entering evidence.

"....two or three videos with people who have been thoroughly and completely convincingly discredited even by the most enthusiastic Q anon types."

What are these 2 or 3 videos you're referring to? And "Q anon" types? Is this MSM jargon and refers to the Mockingbird MSM? Who is "Q anon" types?

"I remember when they decided to “slow drip“ the information on Hunter Biden‘s laptop and it ended up backfiring...."

There's far more legal implications to just dumping information for public consumption. And it seems the FBI and DOJ seem to be a constant theme here. Did we ever see the Anthony Weiner laptop content? No. The question is who is tying the hands of the people who want it released? Again, I think we can look no further than the FBI and DOJ. Rudy Giulinani is another seasoned lawyer with a well respected past that has affidavits from multiple witnesses. Yet, for 'some' reason none of this can get traction. If a lawyer plays his best hand for public consumption, expect the opposition to find away to discredit the affidavit and information.

"Stop worrying about presenting your evidence in front of a court that won’t listen. Stop worrying about giving information to the FBI who won’t do anything. Give it to us, give it to the American people. Get them informed and outraged. That’s the only way anything ever happens!"

I get your frustration. I'd love to see ALL the evidence. If, say, the evidence was dumped into the public domain, there's the fairly large problem of Big tech censorship and MSM non-reporting. Right now the Mockingbird MSM is as bad as Pravda was during the Soviet Union days under Breshnev.

>"For the millionth time. We believe this happened." Enough is enough. You've only mentioned this 997,984 times. Quit exaggerating. :) >"Show us what you have." With the courts, including SCOTUS, having proverbially 'locked-their-doors' to hearing any of the election fraud evidence, I tend to think Powell and company are holding onto their cards for the right moment. I don't know when or what marks that 'right' moment though. I just know in a grand game like this you better play your cards right. You don't get a second chance. Who knows maybe it has already slipped away. I don't know their mindset. I just know lawyers look to act in a very specific way for entering evidence. >"....two or three videos with people who have been thoroughly and completely convincingly discredited even by the most enthusiastic Q anon types." What are these 2 or 3 videos you're referring to? And "Q anon" types? Is this MSM jargon and refers to the Mockingbird MSM? Who is "Q anon" types? >"I remember when they decided to “slow drip“ the information on Hunter Biden‘s laptop and it ended up backfiring...." There's far more legal implications to just dumping information for public consumption. And it seems the FBI and DOJ seem to be a constant theme here. Did we ever see the Anthony Weiner laptop content? No. The question is who is tying the hands of the people who want it released? Again, I think we can look no further than the FBI and DOJ. Rudy Giulinani is another seasoned lawyer with a well respected past that has affidavits from multiple witnesses. Yet, for 'some' reason none of this can get traction. If a lawyer plays his best hand for public consumption, expect the opposition to find away to discredit the affidavit and information. >"Stop worrying about presenting your evidence in front of a court that won’t listen. Stop worrying about giving information to the FBI who won’t do anything. Give it to us, give it to the American people. Get them informed and outraged. That’s the only way anything ever happens!" I get your frustration. I'd love to see ALL the evidence. If, say, the evidence was dumped into the public domain, there's the fairly large problem of Big tech censorship and MSM non-reporting. Right now the Mockingbird MSM is as bad as Pravda was during the Soviet Union days under Breshnev.

parent
link