I've changed the rule to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" and fixed the clarification note to better express the point. I've realized the original wording was not clear and though the clarification expressed my intent to allow dissenting views, it seemed to be contradicting the rule more than explaining.
I've changed the rule to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" and fixed the clarification note to better express the point. I've realized the original wording was not clear and though the clarification expressed my intent to allow dissenting views, it seemed to be contradicting the rule more than explaining.
(post is archived)