Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

973
• (edited )
Please Read: Sub Rules

Because we are janitors and I cannot change the sidebar. We would like to be clear that we have these rules:

  • No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. (We will allow for polite disagreement and criticism. You are free to debate, but please be civil about it. )

  • No advocacy for violence.

  • No pornography or obscene language.

  • No bashing Moderators or Janitors. (We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol.)

Note: We will allow users to make posts asking good-faith questions and we suggest reading the .

Because we are janitors @GodsAngell and I cannot change the sidebar. We would like to be clear that we have these rules: - No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. (We will allow for polite disagreement and criticism. You are free to debate, but please be civil about it. ) - No advocacy for violence. - No pornography or obscene language. - No bashing Moderators or Janitors. (We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol.) Note: We **will** allow users to make posts asking good-faith questions and we suggest reading the [TOS](https://poal.co/tos).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (146).
[–] • 0 pt

We're not ant-critique.

Bullshit.

Yesterday one of my comments was removed... it was a well thought out critique of one of GodsAgell's posts where I pointed out that his entire point was based on circular logic and a presumed conclusion. I made the point that if one were to presume the opposite at the beginning then the conclusion would also be the opposite. The "opposite presumption" being "What if trump is not on our side?" ... I then called GodsAngell a "glow-shill" which all things considered is fairly polite for these parts.

My post was not removed because it was "disrespectful" but because I asked that we at least consider alternative explinations for the facts... this is the definition of "thoughtful critique"

[–] • 1 pt

Was it a comment ? I never saw it, so I can't say I've had anything to do with that. What I can say is that I'll have a talk with my fellow janitor to ensure we don't act as harshly as others had.

[–] • 3 pts

https://poal.co/s/QStorm/311492/6ee63bf6-0488-4975-b746-86aa5ef6676a#cmnts

Deleting comments on your own post because you cannot defend your own statements is not being a "janitor". It is despicable

you want to explain yourself?

[–] • 1 pt

My post was deleted too...

I wrote: God's Angell? Ahahahahahaha....

Seems someone got their tenders hurt...lol.

[–] • 0 pt

I've made an edit to the clarification that incorporates your input.

[–] • 0 pt

And I was blocked completely by GodsAngell for calling him out repeatedly on the wackjob posts he constantly makes and asking him to stop. It happened when I finally posted proof that the guy he was posting articles and videos of (Simon Parkes) was clearly a nutcase. GodsAngell hides behind his account and refuses to answer for himself, He doesn't have the maturity or the skills to moderate anything. He deserves what's said about him and encourages abusive comments because that's abuse in itself. I'm not going to take that.

[–] • 0 pt

You're so mad at GodsAngell you can't see properly and read what's written right by the rules? How unfortunate.

He deserves what's said about him and encourages abusive comments because that's abuse in itself. I'm not going to take that.

So you're justifying any abuse that someone else gets because they blocked you? Look, if you want me to talk to GodsAngell for you, I will. In turn, I'd ask that you calm down a bit.