Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

560
• (edited )
Please Read: Sub Rules

Because we are janitors and I cannot change the sidebar. We would like to be clear that we have these rules:

  • No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. (We will allow for polite disagreement and criticism. You are free to debate, but please be civil about it. )

  • No advocacy for violence.

  • No pornography or obscene language.

  • No bashing Moderators or Janitors. (We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol.)

Note: We will allow users to make posts asking good-faith questions and we suggest reading the .

Because we are janitors @GodsAngell and I cannot change the sidebar. We would like to be clear that we have these rules: - No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. (We will allow for polite disagreement and criticism. You are free to debate, but please be civil about it. ) - No advocacy for violence. - No pornography or obscene language. - No bashing Moderators or Janitors. (We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol.) Note: We **will** allow users to make posts asking good-faith questions and we suggest reading the [TOS](https://poal.co/tos).

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (146).
[–] • 2 pts

No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump posts/comments.

Banning apposing views in the COMMENTS is nothing more than banning any and all discussion making the sub nothing more than a echo chamber that will prevent any real pursuit of the truth. Only those that cannot defend their position and are attempting to hide from the truth are afraid of open discussion.

Go ahead and delete my comment to prove my point.

[–] • 4 pts

We're not ant-critique. Similar to the no insults to janitors rule, we can accept good faith criticism. If you're here to trash Q and Trump for fun, that's not constructive and has no place here.

[–] • 3 pts

Who decides what constitutes " trashing "? See the problem with that?

[–] • 3 pts

Their opinion of interpitation. No room for definition

[–] • 3 pts

The janitors decide that. A janitor's role is to keep things clean. I'm aware of the risks of human judgement and I was chosen for displaying reasonable judgement in the past and will make an effort to continue that into the future.

[–] • 0 pt

We're not ant-critique.

Bullshit.

Yesterday one of my comments was removed... it was a well thought out critique of one of GodsAgell's posts where I pointed out that his entire point was based on circular logic and a presumed conclusion. I made the point that if one were to presume the opposite at the beginning then the conclusion would also be the opposite. The "opposite presumption" being "What if trump is not on our side?" ... I then called GodsAngell a "glow-shill" which all things considered is fairly polite for these parts.

My post was not removed because it was "disrespectful" but because I asked that we at least consider alternative explinations for the facts... this is the definition of "thoughtful critique"

[–] • 1 pt

Was it a comment ? I never saw it, so I can't say I've had anything to do with that. What I can say is that I'll have a talk with my fellow janitor to ensure we don't act as harshly as others had.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You are soooo full of crap, hon. You "janitors" are just more censorship fans.

[–] • 0 pt

What about trashing Q or Trump using fake stories and wild predictions that make the Q community look bad, and them indirectly?

This is GodsAngell's MO.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

you sound exactly like BLM, and Anitfa. I find that interesting

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

BLM welcomes criticism and dissenting views? What world do you live in? ... projection and shilling, pilpul

[–] • 4 pts

Sure they do... just before they burn your business down... C'mon man!

[–] • 2 pts

making the sub nothing more than a echo chamber that will prevent any real pursuit of the truth.

I do believe that is the goal and it has been attained

[–] • 1 pt

Yep.

I don't recall this space dessert ever posting in this sub before. A literal outsider brought in to fuck things up.

[–] • 0 pt

I've made a change to the first rule to better reflect my intent of allowing criticism. I apologize for the previous lack of clarity.

[–] • 0 pt

Really? Then please investigate and penalize Lakptapride, who took a single comment I made and immediately attacked me personally. Let's see you be constant and even handed

[–] • 0 pt

I've changed the rule to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" and fixed the clarification note to better express the point. I've realized the original wording was not clear and though the clarification expressed my intent to allow dissenting views, it seemed to be contradicting the rule more than explaining.