Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K
• (edited )
Please Read: Sub Rules

Because we are janitors and I cannot change the sidebar. We would like to be clear that we have these rules:

  • No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. (We will allow for polite disagreement and criticism. You are free to debate, but please be civil about it. )

  • No advocacy for violence.

  • No pornography or obscene language.

  • No bashing Moderators or Janitors. (We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol.)

Note: We will allow users to make posts asking good-faith questions and we suggest reading the .

Because we are janitors @GodsAngell and I cannot change the sidebar. We would like to be clear that we have these rules: - No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing. (We will allow for polite disagreement and criticism. You are free to debate, but please be civil about it. ) - No advocacy for violence. - No pornography or obscene language. - No bashing Moderators or Janitors. (We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol.) Note: We **will** allow users to make posts asking good-faith questions and we suggest reading the [TOS](https://poal.co/tos).

(post is archived)

[+] [deleted] • 2 pts
[–] • 2 pts

No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump posts/comments.

Banning apposing views in the COMMENTS is nothing more than banning any and all discussion making the sub nothing more than a echo chamber that will prevent any real pursuit of the truth. Only those that cannot defend their position and are attempting to hide from the truth are afraid of open discussion.

Go ahead and delete my comment to prove my point.

[–] • 4 pts

We're not ant-critique. Similar to the no insults to janitors rule, we can accept good faith criticism. If you're here to trash Q and Trump for fun, that's not constructive and has no place here.

[–] • 3 pts

Who decides what constitutes " trashing "? See the problem with that?

[–] • 3 pts

Their opinion of interpitation. No room for definition

[–] • 3 pts

The janitors decide that. A janitor's role is to keep things clean. I'm aware of the risks of human judgement and I was chosen for displaying reasonable judgement in the past and will make an effort to continue that into the future.

[–] • 0 pt

We're not ant-critique.

Bullshit.

Yesterday one of my comments was removed... it was a well thought out critique of one of GodsAgell's posts where I pointed out that his entire point was based on circular logic and a presumed conclusion. I made the point that if one were to presume the opposite at the beginning then the conclusion would also be the opposite. The "opposite presumption" being "What if trump is not on our side?" ... I then called GodsAngell a "glow-shill" which all things considered is fairly polite for these parts.

My post was not removed because it was "disrespectful" but because I asked that we at least consider alternative explinations for the facts... this is the definition of "thoughtful critique"

[–] • 1 pt

Was it a comment ? I never saw it, so I can't say I've had anything to do with that. What I can say is that I'll have a talk with my fellow janitor to ensure we don't act as harshly as others had.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

You are soooo full of crap, hon. You "janitors" are just more censorship fans.

[–] • 0 pt

What about trashing Q or Trump using fake stories and wild predictions that make the Q community look bad, and them indirectly?

This is GodsAngell's MO.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

you sound exactly like BLM, and Anitfa. I find that interesting

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

BLM welcomes criticism and dissenting views? What world do you live in? ... projection and shilling, pilpul

[–] • 4 pts

Sure they do... just before they burn your business down... C'mon man!

[–] • 2 pts

making the sub nothing more than a echo chamber that will prevent any real pursuit of the truth.

I do believe that is the goal and it has been attained

[–] • 1 pt

Yep.

I don't recall this space dessert ever posting in this sub before. A literal outsider brought in to fuck things up.

[–] • 0 pt

I've made a change to the first rule to better reflect my intent of allowing criticism. I apologize for the previous lack of clarity.

[–] • 0 pt

Really? Then please investigate and penalize Lakptapride, who took a single comment I made and immediately attacked me personally. Let's see you be constant and even handed

[–] • 0 pt

I've changed the rule to "No Anti-Q or Anti-Tump bashing" and fixed the clarification note to better express the point. I've realized the original wording was not clear and though the clarification expressed my intent to allow dissenting views, it seemed to be contradicting the rule more than explaining.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

You two can't take criticism???

You better list what you consider insults. There's a fine line there when it comes to people who's feelings are hurt easily, even when truth is spoken.

And not allowing opposing opinions or facts (anti-whatever) is how censorship starts.

I think there's only one rule there that's legitimate.

[–] • 1 pt

Are you pretending you can't see the clarification by the rules?

You two can't take criticism???

It says: "We may be criticized, but remember we are people. Manners can go much farther than vitriol." We do take criticism. What isn't criticism is something like "Kill yourself, moron." That kind of talk isn't useful like good faith criticism is.

And not allowing opposing opinions or facts (anti-whatever) is how censorship starts.

The same clarification applies. We accept good faith criticism of Trump and Q, but not unsubstantiated claims or pure insults.

[–] • 1 pt

Okay, faggot.

unsubstantiated claims

You better go through all of GodsAngell's posts and start deleting most of them.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

That's not clarification. It's vagueness. Quite the opposite.

Insults are criticisms. You're playing word games.

The way you wrote it, you can call a criticism an insult whenever it suits you.

Like if I called you a faggot.

"Kill yourself" is NOT a criticism. You should learn the English language before you start using it.

You're not suited to be a mod any more than that shill GodsAngell.

The same clarification applies. We accept good faith criticism of Trump and Q, but not unsubstantiated claims

Then start by removing most/all of GodsAngell's posts. They're not substantiated at all.

sub·stan·ti·ate

/səbˈstan(t)SHēˌāt/

verb

past tense: substantiated; past participle: substantiated

provide evidence to support or prove the truth of.

[–] • 1 pt

That's not clarification. It's vagueness. Quite the opposite.

Care to explain?

Insults are criticisms. You're playing word games.

Most people understand what constructive criticism and polite disagreement are.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

i just deleted a post i created the link was bad ( it had been removed) by Big Tech and the DS I apologize of not checking it out all the way first ( it has been a few years since i viewed it ) i should have checked...

[–] • 0 pt

There's no penalty for realizing your own mistake and fixing it, dear. I'm glad to be informed though!

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

Stop calling people "dear" it's insulting and demeaning. You aren't over others, dear.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Yes! Finally a little civility!

[–] • 2 pts

Thank you, dear!

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

There you go again, dear.

[–] • 1 pt

It appears deliberate. I think it might be called "dearfagging."

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] • 1 pt

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, hon.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Why the false endearments, hon?

[–] • 0 pt

Agreed....hon, dear, sweetie, et al ... Saying it to strangers adds no more respect to responses/interactions. It's actually quite disrespectful

[–] • 0 pt

Why the fuck are you saying , hon , dear etc all the fucking time? Mother fucker you are an annoying cunt.... you probably the first person I have ever truly wanted to fuck up. Never thought this day would come.

[–] • 0 pt

You joined 10 hours ago to say that, dear? Now nobody can say I haven't inspired anyone.

[–] • 0 pt

What's with the sexist name-calling????

[–] • 0 pt

Because we are janitors

This is the point of janitors. You are not supposed to have the authority to change sub rules. That's what full mods and sub owners are for

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

The rules have always been the same, they're just being enforced finally.

[–] • 1 pt

We'll see.

I smell power hunger.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

SHILLs are people too ....

[–] • 1 pt

You sure about that? Any sauce? kek

[–] • 1 pt

Typically there are active mods to accompany janitors, but in the absence of that we want people to have an understanding of rules and expectations. Especially the point that posting questions will be allowed.

[–] • 2 pts

Banning dissent in COMMENTS is a significant modification to the rules and exceeds your authority

[–] • 3 pts

Banning dissent in COMMENTS is a significant modification to the rules

I'm pretty sure that was common in the past. Either way, I'll do my best to resolve the issue. Thank you for the input.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

There's a vast difference between dissent and viscous attacks against, well everything.

[+] [deleted] • 0 pt
[–] • 0 pt

Didn't Crensch play his skin flute and lead all of the thin skinned ninnies away already. Don't they already have their own echo chamber/ bathhouse. The continued attempt to boil down, dilute, and divide the movement is obvious. I suspect subs with 50 members or less, then it will peter out on its own.

[–] • 2 pts

Some users still prefer this sub, therefore my fellow janitor and I shall offer our best.

[–] • 0 pt

Hey...janitors...my comment was deleted too.

I wrote: God's Angell? Ahahahahahahaha....

So that is an insult to the janitors? Wow...yall need some thicker skin or just keep deleting. Luck with that.

[–] • 2 pts

We are working to reform our approach, dear.

[–] • -1 pt

Don't ever call me dear, faggot.

[–] • 2 pts

Are you aware these aren't addressed to you or accidentally admitting to your alts?

[–] • -1 pt

Good to know. Don't call me dear. t/u sweetie.

[–] • 1 pt

My apologies.

[–] • 0 pt

God's Angell has deleted about 53 comments in the two days since being crowned janitor. Most for insulting her.

Sub log: bottom right of this page.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm aware and we are in continuing talks about how to approach janitorial duties.