Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

I actually discussed this with someone regarding the CoVid vax, That mRNA can be transferred during sex ( micro tears in the vaginal mucosa) will lead to an unvaxed female getting the mRNA.There are antibodies made that will attack during early gestation making the F infertile.

I actually discussed this with someone regarding the CoVid vax, That mRNA can be transferred during sex ( micro tears in the vaginal mucosa) will lead to an unvaxed female getting the mRNA.There are antibodies made that will attack during early gestation making the F infertile.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (16).
[–] • 2 pts

"anti gnrh antibodies sterility"

I found this:

>Immunization with GnRH resulted in decreased testicular size, drop of testosterone levels, and marked atrophy of the prostate. Anti-GnRH vaccine would be tried in patients of carcinoma of the prostate. LDH-C4, a sperm-specific mitochondrial antigen, produced an antibody response in baboons and reduced fertility in the females. Animal fertility control vaccines will be shortly on the market, but the use of recombinant DNA techniques should also accelerate the development of others.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2665354/

gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists that were then in development for the treatment of prostate cancer in men, for their potential to suppress fertility in dogs (Tremblay & Belanger, 1984)...... Because of its mechanism of action of eliciting antibodies to GnRH which then suppressed testosterone production, not only did the vaccine decrease the prostate size of male dogs, but also suppressed fertility, although it never achieved regulatory approval for that use.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/rda.12862

[–] • 1 pt

It seems pretty well documented that the anti gnrh antibodies decrease fertility in men, although I haven't dug into the data. It makes me wonder why a study in 2016 is even bothering studying the use in vaccines for boars.

[–] • 4 pts

They might have been thinking of using it for wild boar control in countries where they are a pest, e.g. Australia?

[–] • 0 pt

But they are saying the vaccine DIDN'T reduce fertility in boars.

[–] • 0 pt

"It makes me wonder why a study in 2016 is even bothering studying the use in vaccines for boars."

My immediate thought was they're good at making bacon. (It's amazing how certain words can trigger the mind.)