Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

Attorney Sidney Powell posted notes in reaction to the court’s decision on Monday morning.

Last night Sidney Powell posted a response to the news saying “irrefutable proof is coming soon.” Powell told her supporters she will not let the fraud stand!

Attorney Sidney Powell posted this on Telegram late on Monday night.

Thank you all! There are still important live cases. Irrefutable proof is coming soon. Keep educating everyone about the facts. Today’s Supreme Court orders were disappointing but we are NOT done, and we will not let this fraud stand. #WeThePeople are supposed to run this country. Our new SuperPAC should be up tomorrow.

Attorney Sidney Powell posted notes in reaction to the court’s decision on Monday morning. Last night Sidney Powell posted a response to the news saying “irrefutable proof is coming soon.” Powell told her supporters she will not let the fraud stand! Attorney Sidney Powell posted this on Telegram late on Monday night. Thank you all! There are still important live cases. Irrefutable proof is coming soon. Keep educating everyone about the facts. Today’s Supreme Court orders were disappointing but we are NOT done, and we will not let this fraud stand. #WeThePeople are supposed to run this country. Our new SuperPAC should be up tomorrow.

(post is archived)

[–] • 1 pt

Plenty of proof; no judges willing to hear it. Sad times for the U.S.

[–] • 1 pt

Sad realization when you discover every part of your country is corrupt. Depressing is more to the point.

[–] • 1 pt

Brother, all legal means need to be exhausted before the Military steps in. We did have Three SCOTUS who sounded the alarm, only 1 required for the Military, but there is a hearing on 02 March 2021. This is what she may be referring to.

[–] • 1 pt

Interesting. What hearing is on March 2nd?

[–] • 0 pt

Our new SuperPAC should be up tomorrow.

Translation: Keep ponying up the green you boobs and we'll tell you what you want to hear

[–] • 0 pt

I don't give money to losers. Show us the proof, strike your hard strike, or move on.

[–] • 0 pt

If the military doesn't act our country will be completely destroyed within 4 years. No more guns or leaving your house. Authoritarians are ruling us and the only remedy is the gallows.

[–] • 0 pt

LOL, you've left out a lot of carnage and death in those 4 years you speak.

[–] • 0 pt

You can take evidence to a judge but you can't make them look at it. Sorta like a horse and water. Judge denials to look and just throw out cases gives excuse for those suffering from a lack of logic, knowledge, reason, cognitive dissonance, otherwise known as the left to laugh at us. I believe our only hope is to get laws changed at state level with criminal penalties in them for State officials and judges for failing to implement them to the letter.

[–] • 1 pt

This business of a court not looking at a grievance is BS. There has to be an immediate place to go to appeal this.

[–] • 0 pt

There is a place. Commonly called the armory.

[–] • 0 pt

People need to understand what "dismissed as moot" means and then read the constitution again...

This is the Court shrugging their shoulders and saying "what do you want us to do about it? We have no authority to remove a President."

Once the electoral votes are certified and the new President is sworn in the Court has no authority to do anything. Impeachment is the only way to remove a President. Period.

[–] • 0 pt

I thought the charge was allegations of massive voter fraud (which is a crime) not removing a President.

[–] • 0 pt

Not arguing... just clarifying what the Court said... they did not dismiss for lack of standing. The dismissed as moot which is them saying "The damage is already done."

[–] • 0 pt

I understand where you are coming from but them dismissing because the "damage is already done" is outrageous. Why do we go to courts in the first place? Because damage has been done to us and we want restitution.

[–] • 0 pt

So the court has no authority to see the case before the election because they can't prove damages AND they have no authority to see the case after the election because it is moot.

>One wonders what this Court waits for. We failed to settle this dispute before the election, and thus provide clear rules. Now we again fail to provide clear rules for future elections. The decision to leave election law hidden beneath a shroud of doubt is baffling. By doing nothing, we invite further confusion and erosion of voter confidence. Our fellow citizens deserve better and expect more of us.

I think people understand QUITE CLEARLY what the courts are saying. They are QUITE CLEARLY telling Americans to pound sand while hiding behind the shroud of "lack of jurisdiction".

[–] • 1 pt

Yeah. It is a total cop out. Like what the fuck is the point of having the court if they are just going to sit on their thumbs. What this is is dereliction of duty.

Have you read the Color Revolution Playbook? Having a election stolen is only part of it... having the steal be OBVIOUS and total corruption of the system is also part of the playbook.

[–] • -1 pt

Ahahaha holy shit the scam never ends with these people. Just hang in another year, two. Three, zzzzzzzzz

[–] • 0 pt

It was ridiculous months ago. Now it's just pathetic.

[–] • -1 pt

What's pathetic are the rubes that will chase this latest carrot on a stick given to them by LAWYERS. Lawyers are friggin liars yet the mentally challenged here want to believe that the hucksters Wood and Powell are actually Atticus Finch when in reality they're more akin to Elmer Gantry.

[–] • 0 pt

OK that is a scam but what about biden presidency ?