![Over 10 yrs ago everybody thought Mel Gibson was crazy [715x715 - 74KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/qXDJuk.jpg){kind=link}
You seem to espouse belief-antirealism, and yet you claim I believe in truth vs falsity.
You diminish the reality of the conflict between the true and the false, and then you cite a "law of nature".
You criticize the meaning of language and argument, and then structure an argument on the basis of several word definitions.
Is anyone here denying the role of motion in temporal reality? No, but you would reduce everything to it, thereby undermining the vertical causation of the intellect itself, without which they could be no apprehension of Logos, no meaning in definitions, no possibility of argument. I do not find what you are saying to be coherent.
You seem to espouse belief-antirealism, and yet you claim I believe in truth vs falsity.
You diminish the reality of the conflict between the true and the false, and then you cite a "*law* of nature".
You criticize the meaning of language and argument, and then structure an *argument* on the basis of several *word definitions*.
Is anyone here denying the role of motion in temporal reality? No, but you would reduce everything to it, thereby undermining the vertical causation of the intellect itself, without which they could be no apprehension of Logos, no meaning in definitions, no possibility of argument. I do not find what you are saying to be coherent.
@Chiro @KingOfWhiteAmerica
(post is archived)