That's funny. Back in the early 2000s if you refused the Anthrax vax you were not eligible for deployment.
When we were deploying , we were not given that option it was forced under UCMJ punishments
I was a civilian contractor and it was get the shots or be fired. I found a friendly medic that just entered it on my record that I got the shot. Only cost me $100.
Medics really are the angels of the military...
^ This is what I find fishy -- why is this particular "vaccine" an optional thing when traditionally soldiers don't have a choice?
It makes me wonder if this ability to choose is intentional to generate these kinds of stories and generate public shaming/guilting of the military OR if military leadership questions the safety of the "vaccines" enough to not force something that could negatively affect their forces.
My thought , purely just opinion, is that it separates the wheat from the chaff so to speak
Yeah, it the virus is so virulent and it's such a contagious life-threatening infection, wouldn't you want to minimise transmission by limiting its contraction and spread by not travelling around the world in 40 days?
(post is archived)