Odd, that the defenders of the show trial suggest that because it isn't a legal trial, altering evidence isn't illegal.
And, how did they convince people that the Senate had the authority to vote something into constitutionality?
Odd, that the defenders of the show trial suggest that because it isn't a legal trial, altering evidence isn't illegal.
And, how did they convince people that the Senate had the authority to vote something into constitutionality?
Patriot, this appears to be a sign they are desperate and losing their minds.
Patriot, this appears to be a sign they are desperate and losing their minds.
(post is archived)