WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

925

ya' know ... I know that i am a nobody from nowhere ETexas, have a small place, run a few head of cattle, seldom leave the property and my opinions & thoughts matter to no one, BUT couple things seem a little off to me 1) Why are so many people around the internet calling for people to arm themselves & resolve issues. 2) Why is there SUCH a call to paint Q followers as idiots? I mean, generally people just ignore a pest until it goes away - making so much noise about Q just validates that there is something to look at

ya' know ... I know that i am a nobody from nowhere ETexas, have a small place, run a few head of cattle, seldom leave the property and my opinions & thoughts matter to no one, BUT couple things seem a little off to me 1) Why are so many people around the internet calling for people to arm themselves & resolve issues. 2) Why is there SUCH a call to paint Q followers as idiots? I mean, generally people just ignore a pest until it goes away - making so much noise about Q just validates that there is something to look at

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

It's already in the works. Why is the SCOTUS even entertaining this? It should be dismissed immediately not brought up for consideration!! https://www.forbes.com/sites/evangerstmann/2021/02/05/supreme-court-will-decide-whether-police-can-enter-a-home-to-seize-guns-without-a-warrant/?sh=30d9e8ce5bb4

[–] 0 pt

I see this as pretext to enter without a warrant in any case. It could prove to be cover "excuse" to have access whether the real concern if there is a weapon there or not.

How convenient.

I have already considered how things would look if some jackboot or suit came into my home, my castle. Might have to "sanitize" it a bit. No, i aint got no trapdoor with a piranha tank. kek

And of course, as we know, it can also be applied then for abuse of our 2A rights.

Seems the push is on to destroy anything "right".

Do i hear a witness?