Let's talk about prophecy and Q | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (28).

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

>"Yea ok you keep believing that."

In studying etymology for over 40 years, I have found with certainty incontrovertible evidence that the Jews are not Israelites, nor did they ever descend from the Israelites. I have provided you a small portion of the evidence from archaeological forensic evidence to several Jewish scholastic publications admitting it themselves. This seems to have escaped your own investigatory abilities. Jews are not from ancient Israelites. Provided below is some more evidence.

The word Jew is an English word originally referring to those Eastern European people who spoke Yiddish. Even the Yiddish people did not view themselves as Israelites. The word "Jew" did not exist during the Roman times. Rome referred to the region as "Judea" and those people of the region as "Judeans". A Roman soldier inscribed in Latin - "King of the Judeans". Every ancient historian, including Josephus referred the region as a greatly mixed population. This makes sense, since the region is indeed at the cross road of trade between three continents. It is also for this reason that there has been constant upheaval of wars. The cross road of trade has always been highly coveted. The entire population of the region has been replaced several times over. When ever it was conquered, its people were enslaved and carried away in captivity. The allies of the conquering army were rewarded with much of the spoils. By the time the Greeks conquered the region, the people inhabiting the region was vastly populated by the conquering aliens and allies. We know from history that one of the allies, who were instrumental for the conquest by Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, were the Edomites. They were rewarded by given the lands of the region. This included the shops, businesses, orchards, homes, and more. It is no coincidence that the ancient Greeks prior to the Romans called the region "Idumea" meaning land of the Edomites. King Herod himself was an Edomite. One doesn't rise to power of a king unless there is kinship of those people. Then we have this from the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41, which states -- "Edom is in modern Jewry".

As mentioned above, the word Jew derives from a 16th Century Old English mis-transliteration of Yiddish. It stuck. This information is derived from English etymology. The name Jew is analogous to the English appellative name "German" that refers to the people of Deutschland. The people of Deutschland (Germany) call themselves "Deutsch" (the people; race) or "teuto" as in Teutonic" as they were called by the Gallic or ""Tuatha De Dannan", which means "race or people of Dan". Obviously, the Deutsch do not call themselves "Germans". Another example to the gross mis-appellation is the name -- "Welsh". This is an English word deriving from High German "wallische" meaning "strangers". How utterly absurd for the alien German Angles to call the aborigine Brit population "strangers". The "Welsh" call themselves among each other "Khumri". The Jews do not refer to themselves as Israelites. In the 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis" and also found in the Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335), it states -- "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'".

>>"Yea ok you keep believing that." In studying etymology for over 40 years, I have found with certainty incontrovertible evidence that the Jews are not Israelites, nor did they ever descend from the Israelites. I have provided you a small portion of the evidence from archaeological forensic evidence to several Jewish scholastic publications admitting it themselves. This seems to have escaped your own investigatory abilities. Jews are not from ancient Israelites. Provided below is some more evidence. The word Jew is an English word originally referring to those Eastern European people who spoke Yiddish. Even the Yiddish people did not view themselves as Israelites. The word "Jew" did not exist during the Roman times. Rome referred to the region as "Judea" and those people of the region as "Judeans". A Roman soldier inscribed in Latin - "King of the Judeans". Every ancient historian, including Josephus referred the region as a greatly mixed population. This makes sense, since the region is indeed at the cross road of trade between three continents. It is also for this reason that there has been constant upheaval of wars. The cross road of trade has always been highly coveted. The entire population of the region has been replaced several times over. When ever it was conquered, its people were enslaved and carried away in captivity. The allies of the conquering army were rewarded with much of the spoils. By the time the Greeks conquered the region, the people inhabiting the region was vastly populated by the conquering aliens and allies. We know from history that one of the allies, who were instrumental for the conquest by Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, were the Edomites. They were rewarded by given the lands of the region. This included the shops, businesses, orchards, homes, and more. It is no coincidence that the ancient Greeks prior to the Romans called the region "Idumea" meaning land of the Edomites. King Herod himself was an Edomite. One doesn't rise to power of a king unless there is kinship of those people. Then we have this from the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41, which states -- "Edom is in modern Jewry". As mentioned above, the word Jew derives from a 16th Century Old English mis-transliteration of Yiddish. It stuck. This information is derived from English etymology. The name Jew is analogous to the English appellative name "German" that refers to the people of Deutschland. The people of Deutschland (Germany) call themselves "Deutsch" (the people; race) or "teuto" as in Teutonic" as they were called by the Gallic or ""Tuatha De Dannan", which means "race or people of Dan". Obviously, the Deutsch do not call themselves "Germans". Another example to the gross mis-appellation is the name -- "Welsh". This is an English word deriving from High German *"wallische"* meaning "strangers". How utterly absurd for the alien German Angles to call the aborigine Brit population "strangers". The "Welsh" call themselves among each other "Khumri". The Jews do not refer to themselves as Israelites. In the 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis" and also found in the Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335), it states -- "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'".

parent
link