Let's talk about prophecy and Q | Poal: Say what you want.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (28).

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

You're using one of the classic 5 major falsehoods, in which Jews work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power, to wit: (1) The Jews are Israelites, and thus God's chosen people; (2) Jesus Christ was a Jew; (3) That 6 million Jews were killed in a holocaust during WW II; (4) That all people are equal; and, (5) That the Jews are just another religious group.

Christianity has NEVER been based on Judaism. In fact Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is. Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting.

Here below is information on Judaism's foundational Passover text. Surprise, surprise, it's not from the Old Testament but rather the Haggadah, a thoroughly Talmudic work. (M. Hoffman III, "Judaism Discovered"). The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence. In it we learn:

In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud: "Where was God under the rubble?" wondered the Rabbis. "How to praise him now that the temple was gone?" The sages agreed: Jews would have to BECOME a people of the book, or they would disappear. Hence, they were NOT a people of the book before this time.

These people are not Israelites nor Judahites. So, Israel today is a false Israel.

The Jews are not Israelites. From their own academic texts we find:

"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'". -- 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis". (Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335).

This is indisputably backed up by the archaeological finds of ancient Israelites and their skulls. Cranial shape and size does not change racially. The Israelite skulls were dolichocephalic (long-headed) with avg. cranial capacity of 1416cc. This is identical to modern northern Europeans. Modern day Jews are brachycephalic (round-headed) with a much smaller avg. cranial capacity of 1266cc. This fact alone convincingly proves modern Jews are not descendants of ancient Israel.

"Edom is in modern Jewry" -- The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41

"Jews began in the 19th century to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860". – Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23.

You're using one of the classic 5 major falsehoods, in which Jews work to conceal their nature and protect their status and power, to wit: (1) The Jews are Israelites, and thus God's chosen people; (2) Jesus Christ was a Jew; (3) That 6 million Jews were killed in a holocaust during WW II; (4) That all people are equal; and, (5) That the Jews are just another religious group. Christianity has **NEVER** been based on Judaism. In fact Judaism is a newer religion than Christianity is. Judaism was created to confront the spread of Christianity - using the Bible as a prop and also to conceal Judaism's ritualistic practice of blood-letting. Here below is information on Judaism's foundational Passover text. Surprise, surprise, it's not from the Old Testament but rather the *Haggadah*, a thoroughly Talmudic work. (M. Hoffman III, "Judaism Discovered"). The Talmud was compiled as a result of the absolute destruction of Herod’s temple, in which every stone was carried away leaving no trace of it’s existence. In it we learn: In 66 CE, when the Roman general Vespasian swept into Jerusalem, Judaism was a cultic, oral religion, with Herod's massive temple as its lodestar. Everything happened in the temple complex. Four years later, Vespasian's son Titus razed it to the ground. A quote from the Talmud: *"Where was God under the rubble?"* wondered the Rabbis. *"How to praise him now that the temple was gone?"* The sages agreed: Jews would have to **BECOME** a people of the book, or they would disappear. Hence, they were **NOT** a people of the book before this time. These people are not Israelites nor Judahites. So, Israel today is a false Israel. The Jews are not Israelites. From their own academic texts we find: *"Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'"*. -- 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis". (Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335). This is indisputably backed up by the archaeological finds of ancient Israelites and their skulls. Cranial shape and size does not change racially. The Israelite skulls were dolichocephalic (long-headed) with avg. cranial capacity of 1416cc. This is identical to modern northern Europeans. Modern day Jews are brachycephalic (round-headed) with a much smaller avg. cranial capacity of 1266cc. This fact alone convincingly proves modern Jews are **not** descendants of ancient Israel. *"Edom is in modern Jewry"* -- The Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41 *"Jews began in the 19th century to call themselves Hebrews and Israelites in 1860".* – Encyclopedia Judaica 1971 Vol 10:23.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Yea ok you keep believing that. Israel is, was and always will be the land that God Gave to Abraham and all his desendants. That being all the tribes of Israel. Therefore it is the Israelites land. The Jewish people are the desendants of the trbes of Israel. I'm quit sure there are people that claim to be Jewish but are not. But you can not tell me That there are zero true Jewish people. desendants of the 12 tribes of Israel that are alive today. Plus you can not say that there is no desendants of the 12 tribes of Israel living in Israel today. You can't prove that. Therefore that land is is the Israelites land period. Always was and always will be. God gave it to them. And Jesus will return there when he comes down out of heaven.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

>"Yea ok you keep believing that."

In studying etymology for over 40 years, I have found with certainty incontrovertible evidence that the Jews are not Israelites, nor did they ever descend from the Israelites. I have provided you a small portion of the evidence from archaeological forensic evidence to several Jewish scholastic publications admitting it themselves. This seems to have escaped your own investigatory abilities. Jews are not from ancient Israelites. Provided below is some more evidence.

The word Jew is an English word originally referring to those Eastern European people who spoke Yiddish. Even the Yiddish people did not view themselves as Israelites. The word "Jew" did not exist during the Roman times. Rome referred to the region as "Judea" and those people of the region as "Judeans". A Roman soldier inscribed in Latin - "King of the Judeans". Every ancient historian, including Josephus referred the region as a greatly mixed population. This makes sense, since the region is indeed at the cross road of trade between three continents. It is also for this reason that there has been constant upheaval of wars. The cross road of trade has always been highly coveted. The entire population of the region has been replaced several times over. When ever it was conquered, its people were enslaved and carried away in captivity. The allies of the conquering army were rewarded with much of the spoils. By the time the Greeks conquered the region, the people inhabiting the region was vastly populated by the conquering aliens and allies. We know from history that one of the allies, who were instrumental for the conquest by Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, were the Edomites. They were rewarded by given the lands of the region. This included the shops, businesses, orchards, homes, and more. It is no coincidence that the ancient Greeks prior to the Romans called the region "Idumea" meaning land of the Edomites. King Herod himself was an Edomite. One doesn't rise to power of a king unless there is kinship of those people. Then we have this from the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41, which states -- "Edom is in modern Jewry".

As mentioned above, the word Jew derives from a 16th Century Old English mis-transliteration of Yiddish. It stuck. This information is derived from English etymology. The name Jew is analogous to the English appellative name "German" that refers to the people of Deutschland. The people of Deutschland (Germany) call themselves "Deutsch" (the people; race) or "teuto" as in Teutonic" as they were called by the Gallic or ""Tuatha De Dannan", which means "race or people of Dan". Obviously, the Deutsch do not call themselves "Germans". Another example to the gross mis-appellation is the name -- "Welsh". This is an English word deriving from High German "wallische" meaning "strangers". How utterly absurd for the alien German Angles to call the aborigine Brit population "strangers". The "Welsh" call themselves among each other "Khumri". The Jews do not refer to themselves as Israelites. In the 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis" and also found in the Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335), it states -- "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'".

>>"Yea ok you keep believing that." In studying etymology for over 40 years, I have found with certainty incontrovertible evidence that the Jews are not Israelites, nor did they ever descend from the Israelites. I have provided you a small portion of the evidence from archaeological forensic evidence to several Jewish scholastic publications admitting it themselves. This seems to have escaped your own investigatory abilities. Jews are not from ancient Israelites. Provided below is some more evidence. The word Jew is an English word originally referring to those Eastern European people who spoke Yiddish. Even the Yiddish people did not view themselves as Israelites. The word "Jew" did not exist during the Roman times. Rome referred to the region as "Judea" and those people of the region as "Judeans". A Roman soldier inscribed in Latin - "King of the Judeans". Every ancient historian, including Josephus referred the region as a greatly mixed population. This makes sense, since the region is indeed at the cross road of trade between three continents. It is also for this reason that there has been constant upheaval of wars. The cross road of trade has always been highly coveted. The entire population of the region has been replaced several times over. When ever it was conquered, its people were enslaved and carried away in captivity. The allies of the conquering army were rewarded with much of the spoils. By the time the Greeks conquered the region, the people inhabiting the region was vastly populated by the conquering aliens and allies. We know from history that one of the allies, who were instrumental for the conquest by Nebuchadnezzar, the king of Babylon, were the Edomites. They were rewarded by given the lands of the region. This included the shops, businesses, orchards, homes, and more. It is no coincidence that the ancient Greeks prior to the Romans called the region "Idumea" meaning land of the Edomites. King Herod himself was an Edomite. One doesn't rise to power of a king unless there is kinship of those people. Then we have this from the Jewish Encyclopedia, 1925 edition, Vol. 5, Page 41, which states -- "Edom is in modern Jewry". As mentioned above, the word Jew derives from a 16th Century Old English mis-transliteration of Yiddish. It stuck. This information is derived from English etymology. The name Jew is analogous to the English appellative name "German" that refers to the people of Deutschland. The people of Deutschland (Germany) call themselves "Deutsch" (the people; race) or "teuto" as in Teutonic" as they were called by the Gallic or ""Tuatha De Dannan", which means "race or people of Dan". Obviously, the Deutsch do not call themselves "Germans". Another example to the gross mis-appellation is the name -- "Welsh". This is an English word deriving from High German *"wallische"* meaning "strangers". How utterly absurd for the alien German Angles to call the aborigine Brit population "strangers". The "Welsh" call themselves among each other "Khumri". The Jews do not refer to themselves as Israelites. In the 1980 Jewish Almanac, 1st chapter "Identity Crisis" and also found in the Jewish Encyclopedia IV, 1902, p 335), it states -- "Strictly speaking, it is incorrect to call an ancient Israelite a 'Jew' or to call a contemporary Jew an 'Israelite' or a 'Hebrew'".

parent
link