I have no problem understanding what ignorance is. We all start from that point. But few get very much further than that, and circle around the things that mystify them for a while and then move on without ever learning anything.
I know some things about numbers, reality, consciousness, occultism and sorcery, physics, etc. so I have no problem seeing what's being presented in the OP. It's the people's reactions to it that I find absurd.
If you cannot define your argument then you have none at all. (see above)
I did define my argument.
You're just copping out in presenting an example of how the subject of the OP is meaningful.
Who's reaction do you find absurd? Those that mock, those that thirst to understand or those that try to explain metaphysical rocket science in terms a neophyte can understand?
Is that the most important question you can come up with?
Do you wish to learn something, or just look for an excuse to argue over little things?
If I were a guy in a video explaining things, you would probably appreciate it more than me being here in your presence doing the same. But what's the real difference? Number of viewers, or the information being imparted?
I know a lot of things about a lot of things. Knowledge and learning is my forte. I'm willing to share but not be directed in what you want to hear, and not waste my time with someone who doesn't really want to learn or share ideas.
It's up to you....
(post is archived)