Glad to hear this, unfortunately my personal feeling is that SCOTUS is terrified of ever getting to DISCOVERY in any of these cases. As such, I have no proof here, but I believe that SCOTUS will tell all the plaintiffs in all cases that THEY HAVE NO STANDING. Exactly what the courts did to Dr.Orly Taitz Esq. many years ago when she had overwhelming evidence that Obummer was a fraud, that he was never a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN (born of two American parents) to be eligible for the office of POTUS, nor was he ever naturalized. Proof that he was never naturalized is the fact the he is still using someone elses SSN, a stolen Connecticut SSN 042-684425 that belonged to a Harrison Bounell who died in 1979. Obummer does not even pass SSNVS and E-Verify which proves that he could never legally get a job in the US, yet the DS made it all possible. The point is that the courts conspired back then hidding behind the plaintiffs "HAVE NO STANDING" argument to shut the case down.
Glad to hear this, unfortunately my personal feeling is that SCOTUS is terrified of ever getting to DISCOVERY in any of these cases. As such, I have no proof here, but I believe that SCOTUS will tell all the plaintiffs in all cases that THEY HAVE NO STANDING. Exactly what the courts did to Dr.Orly Taitz Esq. many years ago when she had overwhelming evidence that Obummer was a fraud, that he was never a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN (born of two American parents) to be eligible for the office of POTUS, nor was he ever naturalized. Proof that he was never naturalized is the fact the he is still using someone elses SSN, a stolen Connecticut SSN 042-684425 that belonged to a Harrison Bounell who died in 1979. Obummer does not even pass SSNVS and E-Verify which proves that he could never legally get a job in the US, yet the DS made it all possible. The point is that the courts conspired back then hidding behind the plaintiffs "HAVE NO STANDING" argument to shut the case down.
Military is the only way. But the SC may want to add their weight to it. There are precedents of flipping an election due to fraud.
Military is the only way. But the SC may want to add their weight to it. There are precedents of flipping an election due to fraud.
I think the truth has to come out in order for the military to act on it. The constitution is shredded on a daily basis and nothing is done about it, so I think there has to be another catalyst: see Myanmar.
I think the truth has to come out in order for the military to act on it. The constitution is shredded on a daily basis and nothing is done about it, so I think there has to be another catalyst: see Myanmar.
Uh huh, sure they are...
Whatever. Anything to keep the pussies from waking up and rising up.
Uh huh, sure they are...
Whatever. Anything to keep the pussies from waking up and rising up.
Just in the nick of time....Oh wait. Hopefully it will come to something.
Just in the nick of time....Oh wait.
Hopefully it will come to something.
(post is archived)