Maintaining security???
Reporters and camera crews have been in the Oval Office many times. This isn't some new situation.
But you're right that the video proves nothing. Closer examination will show that it's fake.
>"Reporters and camera crews have been in the Oval Office many times."
I'm not sure about this at all. In the distant past I'm sure you are correct, but in these modern times the mock-ups are pretty convincing. I've seen the photos of these studio setups. How would we actually know? You may be right, but the level of security has to be very high, no?
I've seen plenty of camera shots and videos of Oval Office meetings, etc. in every presidency.
You suggest that the WH, of all places, is not secure. You suggest that a studio is somehow more secure. Now you use the argument that we can't really know which was used one way or the other, but because you have seen pics of Oval Office mock-ups, it means something.
Not reasoned thinking at all. More like you're trying to support that fake video in the OP.
You need to read my post again and stop reading into it. For crying out loud CNBC Contributor, Frank Lutz even has an Oval Office replica. These have been around for 70 years. Do a simple Internet search for yourself and see the history of replicas.
You stated -- "You suggest that the WH, of all places, is not secure." I never said this. Again, go back and read the post. The official Oval Office must maintain the highest level of security. This is precisely the reason why presidents use replicas for interviews.
Again, there is not any real evidence that Joe Biden is NOT in the White House like some people are chattering about. Show me convincing evidence that Pedo Joe is NOT in the official Oval Office.
(post is archived)