I'm beginning to doubt Patrick Byrne more and more. Another one-sided story from him that makes him look like he's the guy with all the knowledge and connections. There is no way I can believe that he would be brought into Trump's inner circle to discuss election-fraud strategies. Let's not forget how he came into the picture -- as a confessed Clinton gang member. He 'blew the whistle' on a crime he was involved in with Hilary and that's supposed to make us all believe that he's entirely trustable. Trump, of all people, knows better. Did this WH event even occur? He wants you to think it did because that would make him appear important, and if you buy into that then it would lead you to believe everything else he says took place, or visa versa. >So that happened. Really. See, it *must* be true because he just confirmed it. /s No, really. Why would he even put that line in there except to convince the reader that the event actually took place? I knew that Sidney Powell was more or less already in charge of the election fraud investigation before Dec. 18th, and that Rudy Giuliani was in charge of the Biden investigation and was only helping out Sidney Powell because he had the time on his hands, so why is Byrne trying to paint the picture that this wasn't the case? Why is he continually attacking Rudy and making him out to be someone other than we all see? He claims that Pat Cipollone was a leaker to Maggie Haberman at the NYT, but we all know that Trump has built a tight ship that doesn't leak, and if Cipollone was a leaker, he would have outed him long ago. He also claims that he was told that most people at the WH wanted Trump to concede the election, which means that he somehow has deep ties to WH staff, or is very gullible. These claims are important to his story, because they hold it together. I doubt both of them. Has anyone else allegedly involved in this meeting confirmed that it took place and that any of the events that Byrne describes happened as stated? I don't know of any. Most everyone got banned from social media right after this and posers took their places. Many of you follow some of those posers and believe they're who they say they are. Lin Wood is just one example. You have no way to tell if that's really him or not. I say it's not. Either this is part of a larger con being played on the Deep State, or Patrick Byrne is high on himself and taking advantage of the censorship of those he talks about to bring attention to himself. I want to believe it's the former, but I know that just believing what I want it to be isn't the way to the truth. Gotta question everything.