Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2024 Poal.co

175

With the move here to Poal, I wanted everyone to get settled in before doing any mod-like things besides removing those that hate, mock, or sneer at us through their words.

The sidebar on the right needs a bit of work. If anyone would like to work with me on wording or rules or clarifications or links, I'm happy to accept the help.

ON THE SIDEBAR is a nice little legal(not-legal)/cancel-culture disclaimer that doubles as a Voat-PV disclaimer. Feel free to read through it and forget about it entirely as you post here.

For those of you that notice shill/anti-Q/anti-Trump activity, PLEASE ping me to it and don't respond sarcastically (or at all). Responding sarcastically makes YOU look anti-Q when I browse through your comment history. Mistakes were made, and many apologies were had; not fun. If you want to engage them, feel free to post anything pro-Q outside of here and you'll have PLENTY of those types to banter with.

How to ping: @Crensch <--- that's a ping. Place it anywhere in your comment and I'll get a notification.

Also on the sidebar are posting rules. Please pay attention to them. Too many low-effort/no-context/unsupported-claim posts and I'll have to do mod things.

I don't want to do mod things beyond removing those that hate us.

As a community, try and help each other raise the bar for posts. If you posted and someone is telling you that your post is lacking, it could be that your post is lacking. It could be that they're wrong. Work it out if you can.

Let me know what you all think below.

Thanks

With the move here to Poal, I wanted everyone to get settled in before doing any mod-like things besides removing those that hate, mock, or sneer at us through their words. The sidebar on the right needs a bit of work. If anyone would like to work with me on wording or rules or clarifications or links, I'm happy to accept the help. ON THE SIDEBAR is a nice little legal(not-legal)/cancel-culture disclaimer that doubles as a Voat-PV disclaimer. Feel free to read through it and forget about it entirely as you post here. For those of you that notice shill/anti-Q/anti-Trump activity, PLEASE ping me to it and don't respond sarcastically (or at all). Responding sarcastically makes YOU look anti-Q when I browse through your comment history. Mistakes were made, and many apologies were had; not fun. If you want to engage them, feel free to post anything pro-Q outside of here and you'll have PLENTY of those types to banter with. How to ping: @Crensch <--- that's a ping. Place it anywhere in your comment and I'll get a notification. Also on the sidebar are posting rules. Please pay attention to them. Too many low-effort/no-context/unsupported-claim posts and I'll have to do mod things. I don't want to do mod things beyond removing those that hate us. As a community, try and help each other raise the bar for posts. If you posted and someone is telling you that your post is lacking, it could be that your post is lacking. It could be that they're wrong. Work it out if you can. Let me know what you all think below. Thanks

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (92).
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

You've kind of described the dumbing-down of the public - Not everything can be explained in a meme or a tweet.

[–] • 1 pt

Also, the ability of memes to spread and inform shouldn't be underestimated. Not everyone has a 130+ IQ. But it's also not about that. Small, digestible tidbits of information can stick in someone's mind far easier than a long treatise on the subject.

Also, writing to an audience with a short attention span does not necessarily equate to the dumbing-down of the people.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I will NEVER underestimate the ability of memes to inform - In fact, I'd argue that memes were a huge factor in Trump's 2016 win.

writing to an audience with a short attention span does not necessarily equate to the dumbing-down of the people.

As someone with a short attention span, I almost have to agree with you on that one - haha.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm betting you're a little like me in the sense that you pick your battles. Or rather, your mind picks the battles of how much attention is going to be spent on any particular thing.

[–] • 0 pt

I also mentioned writing it in a way that is palatable.

I didn't limit my comment to memes and tweets.

I'd wager I could rewrite just about any post on here to be more easily and willingly read than in its current form.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I also mentioned writing it in a way that is palatable.

I know - but, let's face it, "palatable" usually means "short." We've been conditioned to absorb information in Twitter-sized bites - This results in flitting from one bit of information to the next without assimilating it into a larger Gestalt.

I'd wager I could rewrite just about any post on here to be more easily and willingly read than in its current form.

Can I send you my research? :-)

[–] • 0 pt

Yes, short. Look at the vast amount of information available to us at our fingertips. Look at the vast amount of information in our news feed.

There's still only 24 hours in the day and most people don't want to spend time reading a 10,000 page book if they can read some Cliff Notes. For me, as long as I can go and confirm the data, I'm much happier with someone giving me a quick overview.

I find most of the time, the long research presented is just confirmation of what I already know. More data points that I know won't help convincing anyone if the stuff I already know about the subject doesn't convince them.

You certainly can. I'll be happy to rewrite it or meme some of it as a proof-of-concept. Ideally, researchers could find users that aren't good at researching but are good at writing or meming and ask them for help.