I'm mixed on this - yes, if you taken what he said completely at face value, it sux
But if you look at it as 'leading towards exposure' then he may be trying to guide the discussion to the Senate where he can help expose some of the shenanigans that happened. I'm sure that he knows, as well as every other Patriot, that NOTHING in the way of evidence has seen the light of day in any court. "Lack of Standing", etc, is not the same as 'no or bad evidence.'
I'm mixed on this - yes, if you taken what he said completely at face value, it sux
But if you look at it as 'leading towards exposure' then he may be trying to guide the discussion to the Senate where he can help expose some of the shenanigans that happened. I'm sure that he knows, as well as every other Patriot, that NOTHING in the way of evidence has seen the light of day in any court. "Lack of Standing", etc, is not the same as 'no or bad evidence.'
I lean more to the Cruz sucks line of thinking.
I lean more to the Cruz sucks line of thinking.
Crying about "evidence" in the same sentence as "in court" shows a willingness to ignore what is right in front of them. He calling Americans and Trump liars.
That's not strategic. That's pandering to the communists.
Crying about "evidence" in the same sentence as "in court" shows a willingness to ignore what is right in front of them. He calling Americans and Trump liars.
That's not strategic. That's pandering to the communists.
(post is archived)