Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

588
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/01/ted-cruz-president-trump-reckless-irresponsible-not-prove-election-fraud-court-video/

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

He does a podcast with Michael Knowles. Within the last few weeks the topic of pedophilia came up. When cruz spoke about it he was all stuttering and stammering. It was very obvious that he was EXTREMELY uncomfortable talking about that subject. I think now I know why. I pray that he is exposed.

[–] • 0 pt

Why would Michael Knowles want to be intertwined w/TC? Don’t get it.

[–] • 3 pts

He seems to back off if you ask him lots of questions about Castro, his Dad, Houston early 1960s and Lee Harvey Oswald.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Remember he was spied upon too. I agree with

"'m mixed on this - yes, if you taken what he said completely at face value, it sux

But if you look at it as 'leading towards exposure' then he may be trying to guide the discussion to the Senate where he can help expose some of the shenanigans that happened. I'm sure that he knows, as well as every other Patriot, that NOTHING in the way of evidence has seen the light of day in any court. "Lack of Standing", etc, is not the same as 'no or bad evidence "

Q did tell us the News is fake. .. Lastly, never forget Potus did have to be removed from office for the Plan to proceed.

I still believe Ted is a WH .. I need more than what OP presented to convince me otherwise

[–] • 1 pt

Correction, They all Suck!

[–] • 1 pt

Don't EVER forget that Ted Cruz was a CFR member along with his wife. When he ran for president in 2016, it conveniently disappeared. I would NEVER trust this man. I believe he speaks with a forked tongue.

[–] • 1 pt

Cruz simply returned to type.

[–] • 0 pt

I'm mixed on this - yes, if you taken what he said completely at face value, it sux

But if you look at it as 'leading towards exposure' then he may be trying to guide the discussion to the Senate where he can help expose some of the shenanigans that happened. I'm sure that he knows, as well as every other Patriot, that NOTHING in the way of evidence has seen the light of day in any court. "Lack of Standing", etc, is not the same as 'no or bad evidence.'

[–] • 5 pts

I lean more to the Cruz sucks line of thinking.

[–] • 1 pt

Crying about "evidence" in the same sentence as "in court" shows a willingness to ignore what is right in front of them. He calling Americans and Trump liars.

That's not strategic. That's pandering to the communists.

[–] • 0 pt

Can't look at erased facts...