Not claiming that this is easy to do whatsoever, but if you have access to hard evidence of any public official committing atrocious acts, spread it IMMEDIATELY. Don't delay, don't dangle it in front of the public, and certainly don't start talking in riddles. Every single time people hesitate, they just end up dead and the evidence gets swept under the rug. Every bystander who wants to remain complacent will nod in agreeance,"yeah, he was just crazy!".
Zoom out and think about it for a moment; "You can use the blackmail against them!". Nigger, the fact that they are blackmailed means that someone else is already dictating their actions. At best, 2 groups using blackmail against the same person in 2 different directions just ends up with that person dead (and then replaced with another blackmailed stooge). Further, why should the general public be shielded from this knowledge whatsoever? How do you expect the general public to make rational decisions if you help deny them real information?
What was the most damaging thing for the deep state in the last decade? Seth Rich leaking the emails to wikileaks. Can you imagine how much less you would know about DC if wikileaks had chosen to be mysterious and coy?
The real scandal shouldn't be that these people were blackmailed, although that is a scandal in and of itself. The real scandal is who blackmailed them and why.
This gets me to thinking, if you wanted to expose the who and why, your best bet would be to release the information. However, if your aim was to cover up that information, you'd insinuate that a person is compromised without ever looking into who did the compromising or what they got out of it.
Not really heading in any particular direction. Just a thought.
(post is archived)