I'm not entirely sure what your question is, but understanding the separation of powers will always be relevant when discussing federal law or constitutional issues. The Legislature writes the laws, but it is up to the Executive branch to enforce them. This is one of the most fundamental constitutional separation of powers. Laws mean nothing unless the Executive enforces them. Court decisions mean nothing unless the Executive enforces them. While the Youngstown steel seizure case was basically the source of "precedent" for the Executive to follow court rulings on their exercise of Executive power, there is no constitutional obligation to do so. The fact that Biden is the Federal Executive means that nothing is going to happen through the normal legal/constitutional means. The Supreme Court could rule that Biden and all of his cronies committed treason, but nothing will happen unless Biden does something to enforce the ruling.
I'm not entirely sure what your question is, but understanding the separation of powers will always be relevant when discussing federal law or constitutional issues. The Legislature writes the laws, but it is up to the Executive branch to enforce them. This is one of the most fundamental constitutional separation of powers. Laws mean nothing unless the Executive enforces them. Court decisions mean nothing unless the Executive enforces them. While the Youngstown steel seizure case was basically the source of "precedent" for the Executive to follow court rulings on their exercise of Executive power, there is no constitutional obligation to do so. The fact that Biden is the Federal Executive means that nothing is going to happen through the normal legal/constitutional means. The Supreme Court could rule that Biden and all of his cronies committed treason, but nothing will happen unless Biden does something to enforce the ruling.
(post is archived)