This is really a dilemma for me. My dad is 92 and still going stong. He will soon be qualified for the jab (they do nursing homes and frontline healthcare first, then those over 80).
I have so far kept the topic and my opinion outside of our family discussions. I am not going to take their poisson, but I am not sure about my dad - I do not want to decide for him and I do not want him to worry. He is quite lonely due to the lockdowns etc. and the whole situation is really taking its mental toll on him. The vaccine could put him at rest and get him to go out some more and not be so scared.
This is a real toughy. I want him to live normally for the remainder of his life, and if he believes the vaccine could do that, then why should I intervene? When you are 92, who cares about possible long-term effects, right? I know he hates the lockdowns, and when our prime minister just extended the lockdown for another 3 weeks, he threw a fit, but he is still really emotionally affected by the scare tactics of the govt/media. I think I will let him decide on the vaccine without my intervention because it would probably put him at ease, but it is hard for me not to say something...
I am dealing with the same thing. Dad 90 has been locked up by Cuomo for the last year. Had a small stroke 4 months ago and has never fully recovered. My attitude is no way but I have three sisters who think they know everything. At least my mind has spoken.
What have you heard about the symptoms of COVID that are worse than the symptoms being reported about the vaccine?
Which one is better to live (or die) with?
What other options are available besides the vaccine? (therapeutics. HCQ, etc.)
Did you even read any of the experiences on that page? For a 92 year old, this so called vaccine could mean an agonizing death. You have an obligation to protect your family from this if it is in your power to do so.
(post is archived)