WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.2K

Citadel Investments is one of the largest hedge funds in the world. Citadel is the firm at the center of the GameStop short sale controversy. Citadel owns Melvin Capital who placed the shorts against GameStop. Over the years, they've made an obscene amount of money placing risky bets in the market. If you want proof, just look at the outrageous properties Ken Griffin, the owner of Citadel, has purchased in the past two years:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-23/citadel-s-ken-griffin-buys-nyc-penthouse-costliest-u-s-home

One of the key ways Citadel makes money is that they receive data feeds (called 'order flow') from trading platforms the moment a trade is placed (and before it's settled). They immediately know which way the markets are moving and can instantly place trades to capitalize on this information. Apparently Robinhood is one of the platforms who provides this data feed to Citadel (for a fee). Robinhood is also at the center of the GameStop controversy, since they halted trading of the stock suddenly on Wednesday afternoon -- and it would appear they did this to staunch the losses incurred by Citadel's Melvin Capital. So it would appear that Citadel is a defacto "partner" of RobinHood. Also interesting is the fact that E-Trade also suspended trading of GameStop on Wednesday. What a coincidence, until recently Citadel was the majority shareholder in E-Trade (which they bought at the height of the market collapse about 10 years ago at a fire-sale price).

X22 Report explains it here (forward to 6:20 in the video)

https://rumble.com/vdd9kf-ep.-2390a-cbds-exposed-to-all-the-entire-system-is-rigged.html

This all stinks. Why does the SEC allow the type of electronic data feeds to Citadel to occur? Could it be that Citadel has a cozy relationship with the SEC? They spend $240K a year lobbying the SEC and Treasury. And, they paid Janet Yellen (Biden's new Sec of Treasury) $810 K in speaking fees. All influence money if you ask me. And someone needs to investigate if Citadel is an actual investor in RobinHood. Remember, after the controversy on Thursday, RobinHood suddenly received an infusion of capital of $1 Billion. WTH? Who is behind this investment?

Citadel Investments is one of the largest hedge funds in the world. Citadel is the firm at the center of the GameStop short sale controversy. Citadel owns Melvin Capital who placed the shorts against GameStop. Over the years, they've made an obscene amount of money placing risky bets in the market. If you want proof, just look at the outrageous properties Ken Griffin, the owner of Citadel, has purchased in the past two years: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01-23/citadel-s-ken-griffin-buys-nyc-penthouse-costliest-u-s-home One of the key ways Citadel makes money is that they receive data feeds (called 'order flow') from trading platforms the moment a trade is placed (and before it's settled). They immediately know which way the markets are moving and can instantly place trades to capitalize on this information. Apparently Robinhood is one of the platforms who provides this data feed to Citadel (for a fee). Robinhood is also at the center of the GameStop controversy, since they halted trading of the stock suddenly on Wednesday afternoon -- and it would appear they did this to staunch the losses incurred by Citadel's Melvin Capital. So it would appear that Citadel is a defacto "partner" of RobinHood. Also interesting is the fact that E-Trade also suspended trading of GameStop on Wednesday. What a coincidence, until recently Citadel was the majority shareholder in E-Trade (which they bought at the height of the market collapse about 10 years ago at a fire-sale price). X22 Report explains it here (forward to 6:20 in the video) https://rumble.com/vdd9kf-ep.-2390a-cbds-exposed-to-all-the-entire-system-is-rigged.html This all stinks. Why does the SEC allow the type of electronic data feeds to Citadel to occur? Could it be that Citadel has a cozy relationship with the SEC? They spend $240K a year lobbying the SEC and Treasury. And, they paid Janet Yellen (Biden's new Sec of Treasury) $810 K in speaking fees. All influence money if you ask me. And someone needs to investigate if Citadel is an actual investor in RobinHood. Remember, after the controversy on Thursday, RobinHood suddenly received an infusion of capital of $1 Billion. WTH? Who is behind this investment?

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Read that I think it was Nancy P went to I believe the Capital basement early some mornings and was allowed to make trades before the market opening? Nearly forgot about Nancy buying up Amazon stock (a F.A.A.N.G. company) right before the lock downs, knowing she would clean up on home delivery orders.

Satanic Mafia Queen eating ice cream, she's better than you.

[–] 0 pt

Not only are they corrupt, but it got so bad that it almost brought the FED down for lack of liquidity. That was the key reason that emergency stops were flying around.

[–] 0 pt

Everyone is dancing around the liquidity issue right now. At first that's what we heard -- but everyone appears to have backed off this reason for halting the trades.

[–] 2 pts (edited )

They are attempting to run it like a casino, where a big time perpetual winner is sometimes asked to never come back to their establishment on suspicion of card counting or any of a list of fake reasons. A casino can do that as a private business, the stock market casino is different, they can barely scare people with 'examples' like Martha Stewart.

Truth is (((they))) fucking hate being beaten at their own rigged game, so they cheat harder. It's in their book

[–] 0 pt

I got a feeling that the hedge funds were also doing naked short selling to maximize leverage. With all the buying, there wasn't any shares available to cover their position.

[–] 0 pt

Bribing politicians.

Regulatory capture.

America's greatest problem.

Why the fuck are you posting this in a Q sub.

[–] 0 pt

Citadel is a market maker and liquidity provider. They take a massive short position in order to fill buy orders. And holding orders before executing them is something that's been going on for decades.

[–] 0 pt

Based on that justification, any large firm could be a 'market maker' and 'liquidity provider'. That doesn't justify their advantage.

[–] 0 pt

I'm just stating facts. I used to make a living bidding and offering under their spread.

[–] 0 pt

There is a difference between legal and lawful. Legal is what you can get away with in a corrupt court room.