They cannot enforce for violating rules X,Y and Z for one person while allowing others to violate the very same rules.
when a company does that are they not violating their own rules? That they enforced upon others?
Their rules are not laws. They can make the rules and break the rules all they want.
They might have violated their status as a "public forum" and hence theoretically could loose section 230 protections but you still would have no standing... In that case they could open themselves to libel and defamation suits because of content they HAVE NOT removed but you would have no standing or recourse because they DID remove your content.
Isn't what you're describing discrimination? What if Twitter banned Muslim accounts?
ohm i sell cars you come in and after selling you a car i find out you supported Trump.. that car is financed so i take it away from you because you violated my company POLICY
Aslo This:
Title 18 US Code s/s 242 https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
The first part :
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both;
Completely agree.
(post is archived)