Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

282

Excerpt -

“The mob who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country,” Gabbard said. “But let’s be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol.”

https://youtu.be/Ik1-gYEH-ys

Excerpt - “The mob who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6 to try to stop Congress from carrying out its constitutional responsibilities were behaving like domestic enemies of our country,” Gabbard said. “But let’s be clear, the John Brennans, Adam Schiffs and the oligarchs in Big Tech who are trying to undermine our constitutionally protected rights and turn our country into a police state with KGB-style surveillance are also domestic enemies — and much more powerful, and therefore dangerous, than the mob that stormed the Capitol.” https://youtu.be/Ik1-gYEH-ys

(post is archived)

[–] • 9 pts

TULSI!TULSI!TULSI!

FAKIR. (Look it up.)

Gun grabber.

Socialist voting record. And positions.

And speaking of positions.....Positions over the pool table or in front of somebody's leather couch may be her best qualification

Run of the mill military nurse, nothing notable among "achievements", yet a member of the CFR, listed on their website. CFR listing hidden while she ran for nomination..... Continual bimonthly or so pushes into the interwebs.... Astroturf chat board campaign by tiresome cocksuckers who continually "Hey that Tulsi Gabbard....she's new! She's different! I is uh reel cunsirvativ but that Tulsi!! Gabbard .....I'm going to learn more, she's the one to watch!"

SO tiresome and transparent.

She has ALL the marks of a Globalist sock-puppet controlled candidate, starting with the manufactured cheering section and no obvious source of money.

[–] • 0 pt

A female Marco Rubio.

I still find it strange that she's legitimately calling out Brennan and Schiff. Why do you think she is doing that? How does this benefit the DS?

[–] [deleted] • 3 pts

........ you do understand that they pander to both sides, correct?

Tulsi wants to take your guns. She's on record as saying so. Nothing else matters. She's not on your side.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

I’ll fight her on that. John Brennan needs to be stopped. She’s right on this one. No one is saying we should elect her emperor.

There are pro-2A republicans who want you rounded up.

So we absolutely should praise any politician who believes that our civil liberties are important, that our constitutional rights should be upheld, they should be praised for that every single time they do it. I don’t care what party. I don’t care what else they might be wrong about. We live in an age where saying what she just said took courage. We can fight with her on guns tomorrow. We need to save our country and need all the help we can get.

You are right that she’s not on our side, probably on a lot of issues. Not just guns. But we aren’t liberals with a purity test. We can take people as they come, judge them in a dynamic way, not just an on and off switch. She has some loathsome beliefs, but she has some on which we align. And that’s important right now. Very important.

[–] • 0 pt

And yet she holds up constitutional rights in this video.

I agree, all dems want to take our guns. A key part of their platform for decades.

It just seems really strange for her to come out against her own party, I can't see how this inevitably can help the DS.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Technically, everyone on both sides of the aisle should stand up for the civil liberties of their fellow citizens, even if they disagree with them on certain issues.

She’s either faking it, or she is sincere, but she does have a track record of sticking up for civil liberties. I mean we keep talking about how we have truth on our side why are we surprised that someone would see it? Why are we surprised that someone from the party of JFK will see what is blatantly obvious, that powerful people are trying to control our nation through illegal surveillance and intimidation tactics?

The question shouldn’t be whether or not she is sincere, the question should be why there aren’t way more people in both parties saying exactly what she is saying.

When we protect speech we protect all speech, popular or not, it is our duty as Americans to protect the speech of people we disagree with. I am pro life but I don’t want to silence the opinions of those who are pro-choice. That’s un-American.

[–] • 1 pt (edited )

B/C her opinions on a retired spook and 1 House member are really unimportant. She is claiming space in the Dem Party for national office; like she did by arguing with CamelToe or criticizing Hillary.

The only reason we're discussing it is somebody referenced it in yet another "Tulsi!!" thread. I refuse to be grateful to someone for merely not wishing political opposition into camps.... By the same token, I don't give credit to a co-worker for not taking a dump on the table in the break room.

Gabbard has the same policy positions as Mazie Hirono, the bedwetter whose seat she took when Hirono went to the Senate.

[–] [deleted] • -1 pt

Yeah I don’t like her politics but that doesn’t mean she isn’t right to stand up for the constitutional rights of citizens everywhere.

John F Kennedy was a Democrat. General Flynn is a Democrat. I don’t have to like everything she does to align with her on this. In fact, every Democrat and every Republican and every independent and everybody who has no affiliation whatsoever should be able to come together and denounce powerful politicians and powerful members of the intelligence community trying to crack down on regular ordinary people whose ideas they don’t like.

I’ll fight her on the second amendment tomorrow. Today I will salute her for caring about the rights of the people more than most Republicans do.

[–] • 3 pts

Tulsa is a witch, illuminati witch.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

Doesn't mean much to me what she says now.

We heard Lindsey Graham ask Kavenaugh about military tribunals and yet Lindsey still turned out to be a traitorous faggot. These demons will do or say anything if they think it will help their own cause.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Lindsey Graham and other Republicans are boldly and publicly in favor, so they say, of your Second Amendment rights. However? They probably want you rounded up.

I’ll take her over someone that wants you in a camp any day of the week.

[–] • 1 pt

She talks sense sometimes, but I don't trust her one bit. Also, she is no longer in Congress....Copied from Wikiwiki-pedia: On March 19, 2020, Gabbard dropped out of the 2020 presidential race and endorsed Joe Biden. She had already withdrawn from her U.S. House re-election race during her presidential campaign and was succeeded by Kai Kahele on January 3, 2021

[–] • 0 pt

or is she playing a game...?

[–] • 0 pt

Except the minor fact that she is no longer in any office of the United States. She didn't run for re-election.

[–] • 1 pt

Ahhh, I didn't realize she's no longer a Rep. That makes this make a little more sense, she's part of the clean up squad if the Dems crash and burn with this attempted coup, her hands are clean, she's on the record speaking against their actions. She could be first in line in the "new" Dem party after the old one is destroyed.

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

It tells me something about Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang when they were very clearly pushed aside on purpose, their poll numbers buried, their opinions silenced, in favor of people like Biden and Harris and the fake Indian.

They are both dip shits politically, I agree with them on almost nothing, but they were the only two that were ever honest about anything and they were the only two that had their own opinions and they were the only two that constantly expressed their love of civil liberties and our nation, they were the only two that cared about the flag, they were the only two that care about patriotism, and that’s a start. I will fight them bitterly on their politics but I’d rather fight an honorable enemy who’s not going to sell or nuclear secrets to Iran or hand us to the CCP.

Enemies yes, but honorable enemies. If these guys were in charge of the Democrat party our country would be much better.

Even someone that disagrees with me politically might not want to come and round up my family and friends. That’s what we’re dealing with here. We’re dealing with a group of people who are so radical that Andrew Yang and Tulsi Gabbard make them sick.

[–] • 1 pt

Could be eyeing Senate seat held by a caucasian man in 2022. Hawaiin natives are a bit racist. It would be easier to hop around the islands generating support without having to be bothered with D.C. life in the house of reps. She didn't get much mainland support in her dem. pres. bid so I doubt she is eyeing that again. Just my 2 cents on her future plans.

[–] • 0 pt

Hawaiin natives are a bit racist

You know they are, Haole!

Lol!

[–] • 0 pt

Prepare to be shocked when CFR Tulsi joins Donald as proof of his anti white-supremacy position in the forthcoming 3rd party.