WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

But you still do , lmao ...

Keep believing you're the one doing the stumping and confusing a possibility with an actual observable fact ...

[–] 0 pt

Hahahahaha you're so stupid. Logic isn't your strength is it? Fact is the part that the US issues the treasury bonds. You asked me and I answered. You never did acknowledge that I'm 100% correct in that and you were saying I didn't know who issues the debt or what instruments are used. Then I cited the Executive Order which allows the US to seize all assets of any party interfering in our elections. A reasonable deduction (which of course isn't your strength) is, after demonstrating evidence of such interference, if even in our own Supreme Court, the US can claim assets of China per said EO. THIS MEANS THE TREASURY BONDS OR IN OTHER WORDS THE IOU OR IN OTHER WORDS THE DEBT OWED YOU ABSOLUTE MONKEY. Hahahhahaha! But you still won't admit I'm right because you're a SHILL lmao. I just love proving my point while you blather on with your stupid 3rd grade "I know you are but what am I?" level of "debate". Thanks again for playing. Keep trying. 😂

[–] 0 pt (edited )

" A reasonable deduction (which of course isn't your strength) is, after demonstrating evidence of such interference,"

Demonstrating to who exactly ??. No courts are willing to hear the cases. So once again you're simply believing in things that objectively and verifiably have NOT happened .... But yes, keep telling me more of how you're right .... lol.

[–] 0 pt

You're still stuck on that monkey brain? You won't admit we just don't have to worry about the treasury bonds because China owes us big time from the virus and the world knows it but even more than that... How much is your pimp Soros worth? Hmmm.... 😉