I want it to be over but then shit like this gets posted [907x1280 - 158KB]

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.

Click here to see all the comments (101).

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Oh, so its not that i'm disagreeing but how i'm disagreeing - is that it ??.

I still think you're wrong and absolutely nothing your supplied in your answers has changed my mind or disproved anything but yeah instead of substantiating your argument with some real world proof or precedent you just attack how i frame my disagreement .... JFC you people !! ...

Of course the IMF/BIS are involved ,the idea they will allow the US to forgo it's debt or force china to pay 'reparations without any investigation by some other regulatory body or international enforcement politic is delusional ...

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Aww you self righteous little bitch, there is literally daily proof all over this board that Covid is a hoax, I mentioned the Chinese whistleblower. Here is a video since you're so uninformed you haven't seen the literal hundreds posted here and other boards. https://youtu.be/7Lq3_rsBJ9w

Now if you're saying I need to provide evidence of my theory that something will happen in the future you're dumber than I thought or you're forum sliding, as a shill would.

And if you're dumb enough to argue that, you need to provide just as much evidence that the loans would not be challenged in the case of intentional injury, potentially canceling the loan in lieu of repayment. This happens ALL the time in court. If you know anything about even tort law the primary action is to make the injured "whole" again. How would the cancelation of debt not make the injured party whole? Not to mention the executive order clause about seizure of assets of foreign interference. That could literally translate to trillions of dollars.

But you just keep parroting your stupid premise that "a governing body is needed to cancel the debt." You can't even stretch your mind to imagine the reciprocal - who is going to make the US pay if we have evidence that all parties are corrupt, including your suggested governing bodies like the IMF. And that's not even mentioning that the IMF isn't a governing body, it's literally a fund. It's even written into the name, genius. The stated purpose is to reduce world poverty. And all of that isn't even mentioning the people who run the IMF and the World Bank on whom it relies are complicit in the corruption.

You're still wagging your finger under the assumption that there is some power over the US if we release blackmail tapes and prove various people, corporations, and countries were involved in election fraud. Here's the bottom line - if we have just cause, and the biggest military to defend our just cause, AND the largest and healthiest economy by far, what are they going to do if we say stick your debt up your ass due to the intentional plague you released on the world?

Ummmm we're not proving our case to anyone - we're demonstrating our just cause (trashed car) to the world.

Does that make it easy enough for you to understand?

Aww you self righteous little bitch, there is literally daily proof all over this board that Covid is a hoax, I mentioned the Chinese whistleblower. Here is a video since you're so uninformed you haven't seen the literal hundreds posted here and other boards. https://youtu.be/7Lq3_rsBJ9w Now if you're saying I need to provide evidence of my theory that something will happen in the future you're dumber than I thought or you're forum sliding, as a shill would. And if you're dumb enough to argue that, you need to provide just as much evidence that the loans would not be challenged in the case of intentional injury, potentially canceling the loan in lieu of repayment. This happens ALL the time in court. If you know anything about even tort law the primary action is to make the injured "whole" again. How would the cancelation of debt not make the injured party whole? Not to mention the executive order clause about seizure of assets of foreign interference. That could literally translate to trillions of dollars. But you just keep parroting your stupid premise that "a governing body is needed to cancel the debt." You can't even stretch your mind to imagine the reciprocal - who is going to make the US pay if we have evidence that all parties are corrupt, including your suggested governing bodies like the IMF. And that's not even mentioning that the IMF isn't a governing body, it's literally a fund. It's even written into the name, genius. The stated purpose is to reduce world poverty. And all of that isn't even mentioning the people who run the IMF and the World Bank on whom it relies are complicit in the corruption. You're still wagging your finger under the assumption that there is some power over the US if we release blackmail tapes and prove various people, corporations, and countries were involved in election fraud. Here's the bottom line - if we have just cause, and the biggest military to defend our just cause, AND the largest and healthiest economy by far, what are they going to do if we say stick your debt up your ass due to the intentional plague you released on the world? Ummmm we're not proving our case to anyone - we're demonstrating our just cause (trashed car) to the world. Does that make it easy enough for you to understand?

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

(edited )

Omg no shit, of course Cov-Sars 2 is an Ordo Ab Chaos operation.

You're repeatedly saying something is going to happen with no evidence of it, pure hearsay. When questioned you have a fit over it, you haven't shown me anything that even suggests the entities involved are even aware of the situation, let along do something about it. It's like arguing 'the law and constitution are clear -fraudulent elections mean the certification does not apply therefore biden is illegal and whatever he does is not binding', yet here we are 'Biden is president, making EO's ' .... Cause no authoritative/ governing body will even talk about it let alone do anything about it ...

EDIT: Look it's not that i disagree with the premise given, its that you've got nothing to substantiate what you're saying ... nothing.

parent
link

[–] • 0 pt

Haha, so why do your posts smell so rank of forum sliding? My original post began with "I believe...." I'm not saying I'm certain anything will happen. What I am doing is presenting possibilities and backing up my case with logic and legal precedent. All you're doing is insisting some governing body has to approve of the debt cancelation while I've already shown literally the whole world is involved. And you're saying I haven't provided evidence yet how much have you provided? Here's the flip side - present evidence the US can't just give China the middle finger on the debt we owe when it's proven they engineered the virus.

parent
link

Load more (1 reply)