'Your automatic negativity, discouragement, and sarcasm is what is suspicious.'
Because i disagree with the how doing what you suggest actually works ??.
Who are you proving 'the trashing of the car too' ?.
All financial obligations / loan guarantees have penalties for non payment written into it, when you break that contract it's going trigger whatever clause applies and the chinese will simply go to the IMF/BIS for redress, its that point i trying to get you to address - the US will end up in a far worse position unless the have the backing of an international body for what you claim..
You don't think the IMF / BIS are involved? You don't think they will be exposed if everyone else is exposed?
And it's not that you're disagreeing, it's your smarmy "Umm" bullshit and negativity
Oh, so its not that i'm disagreeing but how i'm disagreeing - is that it ??.
I still think you're wrong and absolutely nothing your supplied in your answers has changed my mind or disproved anything but yeah instead of substantiating your argument with some real world proof or precedent you just attack how i frame my disagreement .... JFC you people !! ...
Of course the IMF/BIS are involved ,the idea they will allow the US to forgo it's debt or force china to pay 'reparations without any investigation by some other regulatory body or international enforcement politic is delusional ...
Aww you self righteous little bitch, there is literally daily proof all over this board that Covid is a hoax, I mentioned the Chinese whistleblower. Here is a video since you're so uninformed you haven't seen the literal hundreds posted here and other boards. https://youtu.be/7Lq3_rsBJ9w
Now if you're saying I need to provide evidence of my theory that something will happen in the future you're dumber than I thought or you're forum sliding, as a shill would.
And if you're dumb enough to argue that, you need to provide just as much evidence that the loans would not be challenged in the case of intentional injury, potentially canceling the loan in lieu of repayment. This happens ALL the time in court. If you know anything about even tort law the primary action is to make the injured "whole" again. How would the cancelation of debt not make the injured party whole? Not to mention the executive order clause about seizure of assets of foreign interference. That could literally translate to trillions of dollars.
But you just keep parroting your stupid premise that "a governing body is needed to cancel the debt." You can't even stretch your mind to imagine the reciprocal - who is going to make the US pay if we have evidence that all parties are corrupt, including your suggested governing bodies like the IMF. And that's not even mentioning that the IMF isn't a governing body, it's literally a fund. It's even written into the name, genius. The stated purpose is to reduce world poverty. And all of that isn't even mentioning the people who run the IMF and the World Bank on whom it relies are complicit in the corruption.
You're still wagging your finger under the assumption that there is some power over the US if we release blackmail tapes and prove various people, corporations, and countries were involved in election fraud. Here's the bottom line - if we have just cause, and the biggest military to defend our just cause, AND the largest and healthiest economy by far, what are they going to do if we say stick your debt up your ass due to the intentional plague you released on the world?
Ummmm we're not proving our case to anyone - we're demonstrating our just cause (trashed car) to the world.
Does that make it easy enough for you to understand?
(post is archived)