Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

781

FTA: "Two weeks ago, Parler went dark after Amazon cut the social media company’s access to the cloud computing services that ran Parler’s app and website. Parler promptly filed suit in a Seattle, Wa. federal court, seeking a court order requiring Amazon to reestablish Parler’s account.

The court ordered expedited briefing, held a hearing, and late last week denied Parler’s demand for a preliminary injunction. The court’s analysis proved solid—and sadly also proved it will be hard for conservatives to counter Big Tech’s stranglehold on the modern public square.

In its complaint, Parler alleged three claims, one federal antitrust claim and two state law claims, one for breach of contract and one for tortious interference with Parler’s contractual relations (or prospective business relations) with third parties. To obtain an injunction, Parler first needed to convince the court that it had “a likelihood of success on the merits” on one of these three claims. Parler was unable to do so, however, and the governing legal precedent makes it unlikely anyone seeking to challenge a deplatforming decision will ever succeed."

FTA: "Two weeks ago, Parler went dark after Amazon cut the social media company’s access to the cloud computing services that ran Parler’s app and website. Parler promptly filed suit in a Seattle, Wa. federal court, seeking a court order requiring Amazon to reestablish Parler’s account. The court ordered expedited briefing, held a hearing, and late last week denied Parler’s demand for a preliminary injunction. The court’s analysis proved solid—and sadly also proved it will be hard for conservatives to counter Big Tech’s stranglehold on the modern public square. In its complaint, Parler alleged three claims, one federal antitrust claim and two state law claims, one for breach of contract and one for tortious interference with Parler’s contractual relations (or prospective business relations) with third parties. To obtain an injunction, Parler first needed to convince the court that it had “a likelihood of success on the merits” on one of these three claims. Parler was unable to do so, however, and the governing legal precedent makes it unlikely anyone seeking to challenge a deplatforming decision will ever succeed."

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (3).
[–] • 0 pt

And this nutso shit doesn’t even count the psyop we call COVID-19, which amounts to another rationalization for tyranny. Here’s my list of what is to come from last February, when we were still being told that COVID would not be a domestic problem and there certainly would be no lockdowns, like in China:

  1. Voluntary isolation of the sick
  2. Mandatory isolation of the sick (they will come and get you, as in China)
  3. Voluntary quarantine (of not-sick people) in their homes, plus…
  4. Curfews and spot checking (for symptoms) on the streets 4a. Travel bans are enacted, including street travel between cities and towns
  5. Hoarding of food/water/supplies is outlawed (to make the populace dependent on the government)
  6. Mandatory quarantines, first at home (you can’t leave the house) then…
  7. Quarantine camps (which are now called Fema Camps and are ready and waiting)
  8. Guns (They will come and get them, as with Katrina in New Orleans; no reason needed)
  9. Vaccination (idiots will plea for it)
  10. Mandatory vaccinations (in the camps and in order to procure food from the government)
  11. ‘Fake News’ is banned (as suggested at ‘Event 201), arrests made; in some areas the Internet is shut down — to prevent ‘a crisis in confidence’ (some measures will start early on)
  12. Cash money is said to carry The Bug and is outlawed
  13. The United Nations, at first via WHO, is gradually given jurisdiction, with some foreign troops on U.S. soil
  14. One World (cashless) Economy and Government is eased in .(Formal Martial Law is declared somewhere around measures 7 or 8)
  15. At some point aerial spraying may be initiated, with some sort of bull shit reason given relating to fighting The Bug. God only knows what will be in these admitted chemtrails.
  16. The Bug will serve as another reason for unlimited surveillance and the curtailing of personal freedoms in general. The excuse will be the ‘identification of people who refuse to be tested or vaccinated’, something like that.
[–] • 0 pt

stop the rant grandma, we know. FFS