Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Appears they were given their instructions by the CCP.

Appears they were given their instructions by the CCP.

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

I absolutely hate most of the political viewpoints of Tulsi Gabbard and Andrew Yang. But the fact that neither one of them had a chance in the Demonrat primary tells you everything you need to know about their party.

Those are the only two with any genuine beliefs or any sincere intentions, they were also the only two who have spoken often about how much they love the country. They are also the only two who seem mostly normal and can actually tell the truth about anything at all. Again, I would never vote for them in a million years, but they would’ve been honorable opponents.

Their party is trash. Just garbage people.

[–] • 9 pts

She's part of the good cop, bad cop routine. Same department.

[–] • 0 pt

this. the real logical thing this tells you is that tulsi has been fed obvious talking points and is being groomed to be president at a later date.

fuck these disgusting child rapist apologizers - including trump.

with jews you lose.

[–] • 1 pt

Gee, no shit Tulsi? Meanwhile this fraud bitch will be the first one to vote against the 2nd amendment to disarm Americans while her left wing anfifa brown shirts burn down our homes.

[–] • 1 pt

Patriot, we are a Constitutional Republic, and they can forget the Corporation DS BS because it is not legitimate or binding, we keep the guns period. and all corporations will be liable for violating the rights of the people. False advertising when you claim to be a social media and then ban people from being social. They are not our employers, actually they work for us to get them money from advertisers.

[–] • 0 pt

Voted for Tulsi Gabbard in the 2020 primary.

Twote about it, saying Trump should win re-election, but that Tulsi Gabbard seems to have honor and integrity, in some terms (methinks that she was the only one on the Democrat ballot who wasn’t obviously a human-selling, child-raping, baby-eater; or such). Said should keep an eye on her.

Been keeping an eye loosely on her, and have only been disappointed by the Biden endorsement. But that, apparently, is something all the cool cats have done lately; keeping under cover.

Maybe she’s crazy. Dunno. Seems sweet.

Are we still typing?

[–] • 6 pts

She is a CFR agent.

You are being kiked without even knowing it and you believe the lip service they give.

[–] • 3 pts

Well, fell for Zbigniew Brzezinski, William F. Buckley Jr, James Woolsey, and probably others that turned out to be probable traitors.

Back in my day, was told Bill Casey was God; but, as it turns out, GHW Bush had usurped that position, eventually passing it on to his protégée Hillary Rodham. So, evil folks move in mysterious ways.

In any event: Thanks for hipping me to that, dude.

I’ll cross her off the list.

[–] [deleted] • 0 pt

OK. Prove it. I’m open minded about it I’ll believe you if you can convince me.

[–] • 5 pts

https://infogalactic.com/info/Tulsi_Gabbard#Political_positions

Gabbard was a 5-year ‘term member'[142] of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)

https://files.catbox.moe/bkcwyl.png

You may want to research who else is on "The Forum of Young Global Leaders".

[–] • 5 pts

She was a member and listed on their website(CFR) before she ran for Prez..... Plus we keep getting these "I dunno, I really like Tulsi...." posts. Not just here, either...every month or so we get a round of Tulsi!

She hasn't really achieved anything. She was a nurse in a suit in the military....yet a CFR member? Smells like a created, astroturf candidate.

Also, she's an effed-up Hindu idol worshipper. Dems need to invest in some normal candidates.

[–] • 0 pt

I have not found anything on her in research, I guess she supports her party and it happened be be Biden. I can understand that.

what I want is truth for both sides, and that people can decide for themselves, silencing free speech is not right as it has been done on the right, and now being done to the left. The founding Fathers protected free speech, popular speech needs no protection, unpopular does. And people can decide for themselves once they are told the truth.

we may not agree on some things, but both sides should have truth, and the right to decide for themselves. and that should and needs to be protected.

[–] • 1 pt

Hear! Hear!!