There were hundreds of thousands, perhaps millions of votes that were stolen, and Paul never brought that up. He left way too much on the table and was too reserved.
He talked about some of the smaller batches, this isn’t a beat down. If he had brought up better examples, the ones with much bigger numbers, and had brought up the specific and direct ways in which the Democrats disrupted any real investigation, that would’ve been much, much more powerful.
He did a decent job, but he kept going back to the most boring of examples. There was massive widespread evidence of voter fraud and Paul barely touched on the examples. He kept going back to how George Stephanopoulos was calling him a liar, let that go, no one gives a shit, talk about the evidence. Bring it up. More examples. Use facts. Overwhelm him with the facts. See this is where we need Ted Cruz. He is much, much better at this.
I mean, talking about a few thousand votes here and there really isn’t convincing. This is very far from a beat down.
Stephanopoulos was even able to say repeatedly that the fraud they found wasn’t enough to overturn any of the states and that’s simply not true and Paul never challenged that. George Stephanopoulos said a few things that were completely untrue that were not challenged.
(post is archived)