[–] • 1 pt That way he can lose the election through fraud under a different name. Yay. That way he can lose the election through fraud under a different name. Yay. link [+] [deleted] • 2 pts [deleted by user] [–] [deleted] • 1 pt NO part of our election system should be proprietary. NO part of our election system should be proprietary. parent link [–] • 0 pt Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. parent link Load more (1 reply)
[+] [deleted] • 2 pts [deleted by user] [–] [deleted] • 1 pt NO part of our election system should be proprietary. NO part of our election system should be proprietary. parent link [–] • 0 pt Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. parent link Load more (1 reply)
[–] [deleted] • 1 pt NO part of our election system should be proprietary. NO part of our election system should be proprietary. parent link [–] • 0 pt Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. parent link Load more (1 reply)
[–] • 0 pt Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. Excellent point!!! That's how they are covering up the truth about their fraud software, to prevent investigators to get to the bottom of things. parent link Load more (1 reply)
(post is archived)