Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

352

Whether the results of what has happened in the last 4 years were part of "the plan" or not, there was one big positive result - a huge groundswell of popular support and coalescing of a scattered peoples.

There was one common theme that entire time: Rule of Law and following the Constitution.

To that end, even before there was a Constitution, there was a Declaration of Independence, which specifically said:

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

What happens when a government becomes so tyrannical that we, even in good conscience, cannot consent to it?

I explore that question (and more) in a draft treatise here:

https://files.catbox.moe/egbfst.txt

Before starting a "boots on the ground revolution" the next step should be to inform every level of government "I do not consent" to their laws and tyranny.

If enough people form a movement of non-consent, then all the politicians will have to take note.

"I do not consent" is the warning across the bow for all of these tyrants before our Natural Rights - ie, 2nd Amendment - goes hot.

Whether the results of what has happened in the last 4 years were part of "the plan" or not, there was one big positive result - a huge groundswell of popular support and coalescing of a scattered peoples. There was one common theme that entire time: Rule of Law and following the Constitution. To that end, even before there was a Constitution, there was a Declaration of Independence, which specifically said: “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” What happens when a government becomes so tyrannical that we, even in good conscience, cannot consent to it? I explore that question (and more) in a draft treatise here: https://files.catbox.moe/egbfst.txt Before starting a "boots on the ground revolution" the next step should be to inform every level of government "I do not consent" to their laws and tyranny. If enough people form a movement of non-consent, then all the politicians will have to take note. "I do not consent" is the warning across the bow for all of these tyrants before our Natural Rights - ie, 2nd Amendment - goes hot.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (35).
[–] • 1 pt

The voices of millions of citizens meant jack shit last November.

This is not the 40s. The government is not going to engage you on any topic because they do no have to. They do not even have to send troops to suppress you.

All they have do do is sic their woke mob on you, let the media denigrate you, let social media silence you, and let banks and finance companies refuse you service.

You can be effectively gulaged in your own home without encountering a single person in the flesh.

[–] • 0 pt

Which is exactly why a movement is needed.

The movement isn't going to play by their rules, because their rules are unjust and tyrannical.

A single man opting out will definitely lose.

With enough people in a neighborhood, the chances start to go up. With everyone in a neighborhood, the chances go even higher.

Calling is the first step. There are many other steps that need to be addressed and coordinated to make the movement succeed.

Not participating in society can be one step. Benevolent supporters can coordinate supplies and other needs.

I'm just spitballing - I need a lot of help and support too, but this is something that if not started NOW when all the people are here, all the connections still strong, and the country as a whole still in workable shape - then we are all doomed.

I refuse to be a slave any longer, and until someone specifically deserves my consent - I am not living under tyranny.

[–] • 0 pt

Tldr still drinking the Qool-aid.