WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

1.3K

Whether the results of what has happened in the last 4 years were part of "the plan" or not, there was one big positive result - a huge groundswell of popular support and coalescing of a scattered peoples.

There was one common theme that entire time: Rule of Law and following the Constitution.

To that end, even before there was a Constitution, there was a Declaration of Independence, which specifically said:

“Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.”

What happens when a government becomes so tyrannical that we, even in good conscience, cannot consent to it?

I explore that question (and more) in a draft treatise here:

https://files.catbox.moe/egbfst.txt

Before starting a "boots on the ground revolution" the next step should be to inform every level of government "I do not consent" to their laws and tyranny.

If enough people form a movement of non-consent, then all the politicians will have to take note.

"I do not consent" is the warning across the bow for all of these tyrants before our Natural Rights - ie, 2nd Amendment - goes hot.

Whether the results of what has happened in the last 4 years were part of "the plan" or not, there was one big positive result - a huge groundswell of popular support and coalescing of a scattered peoples. There was one common theme that entire time: Rule of Law and following the Constitution. To that end, even before there was a Constitution, there was a Declaration of Independence, which specifically said: “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” What happens when a government becomes so tyrannical that we, even in good conscience, cannot consent to it? I explore that question (and more) in a draft treatise here: https://files.catbox.moe/egbfst.txt Before starting a "boots on the ground revolution" the next step should be to inform every level of government "I do not consent" to their laws and tyranny. If enough people form a movement of non-consent, then all the politicians will have to take note. "I do not consent" is the warning across the bow for all of these tyrants before our Natural Rights - ie, 2nd Amendment - goes hot.

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

You can go to camp.

I have no plans of ever being taken to one.

[–] -1 pt

I was just funnin. The movement means nothing until we achieve the objective. NOTHING.

[–] 2 pts

100%. Just a bunch of school yard kids playing super secret military agent men.

Or bored ass old men with nagging wives and they can't get out of the house.

mentally ill

[–] 0 pt

dude, it's mainly women , pumped up by communism feminism movement . Thomas Cowell has great lectures explaining this, they guy is a genius.

[–] 0 pt

Thanks :)

I think it would be a waste to have all this support just fizzle out without achieving anything.

The objective of destabilizing government from local to DC would be a fantastic objective, and only a strong movement can achieve that goal - whether by civil disobedience or by force.

It would be nice to not have to use force, so that is why I think the "I do not consent" movement might be a good start.

The game then becomes chicken - who fires the first shot.