WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

Back in the 1990s when I was reading the SPOTLIGHT newspaper, I was shocked to learn that the United States of America had been incorporated in 1871. What I never knew until recently was that they incorporated in of all places ENGLAND where the Rothschild banks control all international banking. Just stunning what the DS has done to this country.

Here is a link for more details.

https://americanherald.org/?p=607

Back in the 1990s when I was reading the SPOTLIGHT newspaper, I was shocked to learn that the United States of America had been incorporated in 1871. What I never knew until recently was that they incorporated in of all places ENGLAND where the Rothschild banks control all international banking. Just stunning what the DS has done to this country. Here is a link for more details. https://americanherald.org/?p=607

(post is archived)

[–] 7 pts

Absolutely true. We never actually separated ourselves from the Crown. People wonder why American politicians are knighted by the queen.

[–] 4 pts

Its not the Crown. The American Revolution started because the Jewish English Banks would not allow the New England colonies to create their own SCRIPT money. I read this in the writtings of Benjamin Franklin. When he visited England, he was asked by bankers about where they were getting more currency to put up new loans for new development and for the people and Franklin simply said that they created it as needed. That was the dirty little secret that the banksters wanted kept from the people, that they also created credit out of thin air. So the powerful banksters convinced (paid off) MPs in Parliament that they needed to better control the Colonies. They convinced Parliament to raise taxes on the Colonies which was the spark that ignited the Revolutionary war. The Boston Tea Party was just part of the revolt against higher taxes which were mostly used to pay the interest on the national debt incurred by Parliament to the Rothschild bankers.

[–] 0 pt

Couldn't have said it better myself, now do The Civil War.

[–] 0 pt

Unfortunately, you may be right.

[–] 3 pts

The SpotLight is sorely missed.

[–] 2 pts

Wow its so great to meet a former SPOTLIGHT reader. I learned so many things from them in my much younger years. It was great to stay informed on Globalist activities when there was still a remnant of FREE SPEECH in this country. God bless.

[+] [deleted] 2 pts
[–] 2 pts

America was under ownership of London vactican and the rothchilds. Now it makes sense as to why the Fathers never created a police force and gave that right to We the People....... 1772- Boston Tea Party (no tax).. 1840s Sir Robert Peel of LONDON created a military style 'chain of command' police force starting in BOSTON..... 1861 Abe started the 'civil' war because the South didnt want to pay taxes nor be under English rule.... 1862--Abe created the IRS.... 1865 American Hero-John Wilkes Booth killed Abe... 1871 America became a corporation under London, Vatican rule.... Starting to make sense as to why cops fear "Constitutional lawyers?"........... the plan was for the cops to harass the blacks into conforming so they would 'fight against the American system' to promote NWO.. reverse psychology.

[–] 1 pt

Good info. GREAT REPLIES EVERYONE!!!

[–] 2 pts

Correct me if I am wrong but I don't think it was England but "The City of London", there is a difference.

There are only three city States in the world, Vatican City. City of London and Washington DC. Each of those city states are separate legal entities and not part of the countries they reside.

Vatican City is not technically part of Italy, City of London is not part of England or even London proper and the same is true for DC

[–] 2 pts

Just read the article from the American Herald that I posted and it does say England and is not specific to London. You may be right however, it was the center of commerce at that time. As for the city state of London, you are correct, even the Queen has to ask permission to enter the boundaries of the City of London. Every year when opening Parliament its been a tradition to exemplify this fact with ceremony when entering the City gates.

[–] 1 pt

Of course. Who do you think owns the majority stake in the Federal Reserve? The Bank of England

[–] 1 pt

I know about the Fed but never knew about the incorporation of the US in England instead of the US.

[–] 3 pts

It's criminal that it's been hidden from the US all this time...

[–] 1 pt

Have to agree with you there. Now just imagine how many other secrets that the DS, CIA, FBI etc. has kept from President Trump.

[–] 0 pt

This is why Trump tripped all over her walked in front of her and did not follow protocol when he visited the queen and reviewed the troops with her. I knew something was up.

[–] 0 pt

Queen Elizabeth II loves Trump, its the crazy socialist Londoners that hated President Trump along with many Liberals in Parliament. Queen Elizabeth is very conservative unlike her idiotic son Charles and his liberal son Harry. Anyway, the Queen invited President Trump to one of her retreats further north for security reasons and all went very well. POTUS said it was a great visit and that he really likes the Queen.

That's right. Both UK and US are controlled by Anglo-Saxons, who are controlled by jews.

[–] 1 pt

Well that may be true to a point, but remember that the people whom colonized New England were mostly British that included the Welsh, the Scots, the Irish and the English. So you cannot rightly call everyone from Great Britain, Anglo-Saxons. Remember that the very first British who defeated Julius Caesar with thousands of chariots in 55BC when he attempted a foothold in Britain were not Saxons or Angles. Yes the Britons actually used chariots, two men on the chariot and two horses harnessed. That was the reason the Romans called the Britons barbarians because they never fought fairly. The British chariots were used with trained fighting horses that mowed down the legions. NOT FAIR said the Romans. Anyway, the first British were NOT Saxons, or Angles, or Celts, or Jutes, they were real BRITONS. When the Saxons started invading Britain at around 510AD on the eastern shore it was the Saxons who first named the Britons, "WALISHE" which means stranger and that is where the name WELSH is from. So bottom line, the British whom colonized New England were mainly Scots, Welsh, Irish and English.

I was going to say Israel.... Derp, it didn't exist back then.

[–] 1 pt

You are right there. Funny thing that you mention it, when they created the State of Israel for those whom practice Judaism, aka Babylonian Talmudism, aka the Tradition of the Elders which Christ denounced, via the Balfour declaration, in reality the dirty little secret was that the Europeans were trying to get rid of them and send them somewhere else. Then I guess the majority of those whom claim to be of Tribe of Judah and are NOT knew that they had it too good among the Christian nations.

[–] 0 pt

wasn't the entire point of the revolution to get us out from under england?

[–] 0 pt

Yes if you read my earlier message, the American Revolution started because the Jewish English Banks would not allow the New England Colonies to create their own SCRIPT money. I read this in the writtings of Benjamin Franklin. When he visited England, he was asked by bankers about where they were getting more currency to finance new development and to accommodate the growing population, and Franklin simply said that they created new coinage as needed. The Colonies were using Spanish, French and British coins for exchange and when there was a shortage of currency the Colonies just minted their own coinage. That was the dirty little secret that the banksters wanted kept from the people, that they also created credit out of thin air. So the powerful banksters convinced (paid off) MPs in Parliament that they needed to better control the Colonies. They convinced Parliament to raise taxes on the Colonies which was the spark that ignited the Revolutionary war. Because of the growing prosperity in the New England Colonies the bankers were wondering why they were not profiting from this as well and Benjamin Franklin had explained it to them not realizing the banks would not allow that to continue. By raising taxes the bankers had planned to squeeze the colonists dry of available coinage in circulation which would force the colonists to borrow from the banks. The bankers had never expected the enterprising New England States to mint their own coinage which had foiled all their plans of usury. The Boston Tea Party was just part of the revolt against higher taxes which were mostly used to pay the interest on the national debt incurred by Parliament to the Rothschild bankers. So it was the bankers who used the military might of the British to regain control over the Colonies. Just as the banksters have been responsible for all the wars, financing both sides.

Remember that the British monarchy had very few powers left and had NO POWERS to impose taxes, it was the British Parliament that hid behind the mantle of the Crown in order to raise taxes to finance their own endeavors. The King was only a figurehead at that point in history and it was the bankers that really had the power to control nations. M. Amshel Rothschild the father of international banking did say, "It matters not what puppet sits on the throne of England, because whomever controls the money, controls the nation and I control the money."......

From the writtings of the Founding Fathers like Benjamin Franklin, John Adams, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson this was the real reason why America broke away from Britain and destroyed the grip of the SATANIC Rothschild banksters of England who had finally lost control of the currency in the New England States, only to regain that control by the subterfuge of Congress in 1871.