WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

668

Their retraction-admission validates what President Trump stated in the very beginning of the pandemic.

Funny how that works.

Their retraction-admission validates what President Trump stated in the very beginning of the pandemic. Funny how that works.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This was done last year in June a few weeks after the study was published. It was named #lancetgate.

I know because I was one of the medical researchers who debunked the paper and published the glaring errors on my twitter account which helped get it taken down (twitter.com/arkancideisreal)

The account has of course been terminated by twitter but the story is archived by Chris Martenson here: https://youtu.be/IUD_wvkNhnk

Is there another development in this story just now that I've missed?

[–] 1 pt

I got duped. I checked the publish date of the article I posted (Jan 21 IIRC), the publish date of the article it referenced (Jan 18 IIRC), but I didn't dig down to the 3rd level, the rescission date on the report itself before posting! No, nothing new. And it did seem strangely familiar while reading the article, I figured it was just another faux HCQ trial they quickly produced that was finally being rescinded. Sorry for the confusion, I'll try harder ...

[–] 1 pt

Don't worry. We are all getting duped. It's a constant misinformation battle!