WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

210

“FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING” — United States Supreme Court * “Vitiates” in a legal context means negates, quashes, annuls, invalidates, revokes and abrogates

“FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING” — United States Supreme Court * “Vitiates” in a legal context means negates, quashes, annuls, invalidates, revokes and abrogates

(post is archived)

[–] 3 pts

YES!!! THIS!!!

vi•ti•ate vĭsh′ē-āt″ transitive verb To reduce the value or quality of; impair or spoil. transitive verb To corrupt morally; debase: synonym: corrupt. transitive verb To make ineffective (a contract or legal stipulation, for example); invalidate.

Bundle ALL 60+ cases together in a Writ of Quo Warranto, and ANY evidence of fraud will make Biden's "presidency" legally null and void.

[–] [deleted] 1 pt (edited )

No. No. That’s not how they could win this. They need to make it simple. Build a narrative from the most egregious examples. If you can’t present your case in a minute and a half, you’re not going to win. It’s like pitching a movie or a novel, unless you can pitch a story in three sentences you aren’t selling it.

Democrats understand marketing and Republicans don’t and haven’t since Reagan.

Literary agents will literally throw your query letter away if it’s more than a few paragraphs. And half of that is going to be your biographical information. I’m not exaggerating.

There’s a reason why lawyers make great agents. They’ve always understood this. You need to sell the quart room, you need to sell a judge, you need to pitch them. I need to push the American people. Need to push politicians to get them on your side. They think they are going to lose because of backing you they are out.

Did you see the people presenting fraud? They didn’t know how to speak, they didn’t know how to present, they looked sweaty and nervous, that’s why so many people just assumed election fraud was another conspiracy theory. We had one guy complaining that he had 20 minutes of material and they only gave him five minutes to speak. He is someone who just doesn’t get it. They’re never gonna give you more than a couple minutes dude.

[–] 1 pt

True. That's why the Military is the only way. THEY will PROVE the fraud since DoD/CISA have all the evidence, which will justify their relentless Military response.

[–] [deleted] 2 pts

The one part of this I have always bought 100% is that if it’s going to happen it had to happen with the military. Control communications, broadcast the case, people can see it and hear it and read it for themselves. If we tried to make the argument ourselves, as a party, either as Trump supporters or as Republicans or as independent conservative, whatever, it would be too easy to dismiss. We need undivided attention.

Also, it needs to be overwhelming. Not just election fraud. Biden’s ties to China, lying for FISA warrants under the Obama team, fraud and deception in the FBI, DOJ and CIA. It needs to be overwhelming and irrefutable and we need time to lay that out. And really that’s just a crap we discovered in the last administration.

There are plenty of other scandals I’m sure we can be classify or discuss or bring to the table if the military has our complete attention. Tell CNN and Fox to shove it for a minute and let the big boys talk.

[–] 1 pt

They will blackhole evidence and ignore pleas for justice.

The people who illegally used FISA to spy on a presidential candidate and then ran two impeachments to stymie an entire presidential term, will laughingly vitiate any righteous action.

Absolutely. And the electioln wasn't fraud - it was FRAUD

[–] 0 pt

The challenge is getting a court to hear the evidence and to rule that fraud occurred such that it overturns the election.

[–] [deleted] 0 pt (edited )

Which is why everyone involved went out of their way to make sure they never bent at all in denying that fraud even took place.

Fraud took place. We all know that. Hell, they know that. But they never wavered and they stayed on point like professionals. Do you even know who led their legal team? Most people don’t.

Unlike our side, their message is succinct, logical, unified and presented well.

Their lawyers aren’t making asses out of themselves on Twitter making big promises they can’t keep, battling for attention stumbling over their words, making multiple mistakes in filing documents, and presenting their arguments in ways that are impossible for the average person to digest in a short period of time. Democrats boil it down to the simple syrup. Conservatives always make fun of how liberals use catchphrases and slogans but they work.

[–] 0 pt

Maybe the idiocy was part of a show.