Well I stopped 6 months in.
So, Trump had the election stolen. It was done in the open, tons of evidence, no one stepped in to help him (and us) including the supreme court. Everyone in all parts of the infrastructure showed their true colours and stabbed Trump in the back.
The Q thing was about a lot of things, but largely the thrust was that Trump will win because of events happening in the background.
How do you square the election steal against the claims that people were helping Trump win the election?
you need to bring people to the very edge of the cliff.....with one foot hanging over it----they need to stare into the abyss that's in front of them--to wake the sheep the fuck up---but 4-6% will always be lost
Agreed - otherwise we'd just yawn and return to complacency
None of this means anything. Trump isn't president. How do you interpret that?
I've been listening to people talk about Q for the last month or two, I've checked in today to see how the narrative gels. It turns out the reason it's still a-ok is that the inauguration was illegal for a handful of reasons. Trump did step down and is not president, but Biden also is not president. The show is currently still being carried by the dems but the military are in control.
At some point the sham will be revealed, including that everyone involved knew they weren't president and were just playing make believe. Hey I'm not saying I believe it, I'm just saying that's what I'm getting.
Guess you'll have to find out for yourself.
(post is archived)