Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2026 Poal.co

1.4K

Hi guys.

FULL DISCLOSURE: I followed Q when it first came out for about 6 months, it was fun. Very quickly it became clear that it was nothing not because nothing came true but because there is no such thing as a leak from high up that lasts for 6 months.

Leaks are highly targeted, usually well vetted micro releases. I guess you can say our media is the left equivalent to a long running disinfo campaign, so maybe my thesis is wrong. Q just didn't ring true to me.

So, just curious:

1) I see mild Q like posts here, not full blown Steve Piechenick type of full blown nonsense here. Do you guys believe Q is the real thing or even beleived it in the past?

2) Given that nothing Q has said has come true, do you still believe it?

I had a bit of fun posting at the expense of Q followers for the last few days, for sure. But I do have to admit that the anti pedophilia stuff and a bunch of various tropes are true so it's not like Q believers are bad people. Going forward, Q and all that stuff doesn't matter, we must now get off of our computers and act.

Anyway, just curious if anyone wanted to comment and clue me in a bit.

Hi guys. FULL DISCLOSURE: I followed Q when it first came out for about 6 months, it was fun. Very quickly it became clear that it was nothing not because nothing came true but because there is no such thing as a leak from high up that lasts for 6 months. Leaks are highly targeted, usually well vetted micro releases. I guess you can say our media is the left equivalent to a long running disinfo campaign, so maybe my thesis is wrong. Q just didn't ring true to me. So, just curious: 1) I see mild Q like posts here, not full blown Steve Piechenick type of full blown nonsense here. Do you guys believe Q is the real thing or even beleived it in the past? 2) Given that nothing Q has said has come true, do you still believe it? I had a bit of fun posting at the expense of Q followers for the last few days, for sure. But I do have to admit that the anti pedophilia stuff and a bunch of various tropes are true so it's not like Q believers are bad people. Going forward, Q and all that stuff doesn't matter, we must now get off of our computers and act. Anyway, just curious if anyone wanted to comment and clue me in a bit.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (39).
[–] • 0 pt

This was a more fruitful response than I had anticipated. I'm addressing your comments sequentially.

As far as the 'need' for Q drops; at best that's debatable and without knowing the plan is going to be speculation. I believe you are overly optimistic on what Trump could have accomplished through fireside chats. Remember, he wasn't even sworn in when they were discussing impeachment.

a) Yes, the increase in populism that Trump has seen should be a concern, but when the bad guys were already anticipating to reduce the world population to 500 million, I'm not sure that 'the people' are a 'concern' as much as 'a problem to be dealt with'.

b) This is a good point, my opinion is that the TDS had already been implanted. There's really not much rational discussion to be had with people so vested in the continuation of the status quo.

c) Possibly valid, but remember, Fauci and friends all started talking about Covid as something to not worry about until it had a chance to spread. THEN they demanded social controls. Even then they started counting deaths as "Trumps fault". Even with his initial cabinet, somewhere around 3/4 of them were all comped. Even those that appeared clean were just biding time.

You seem to be treating the Trump presidency like it could be compared with when Bush was inaugurated. The deep state clearly saw Trump as a threat early on.

As for if Q was 'necessary' to avoid the more detrimental planned outcomes, I could only guess. I understand your point about the scoobie doo mysteries. That was one that annoyed me of followers early on. Guys like SBBH would post these intricate deciphers of inane posts finding codes and even describing a method, the thing is that he wasn't even logically consistent in his deciphering and was clearly trying to fill in what was wanted. As a test, I tried to replicate a simple sentence code that could have 2 meanings and it was near impossible and would not be a code that could reasonably be used as comms. All in an effort to figure out the plan, but there was never enough information provided to make predictions, only confirmations after the fact.... and when you add in double (or more) meanings, some statements get confirmed from multiple angles.

Where Q really did benefit was focusing people to dig deeper into the MKUltra, sex slavery, Epstein and Weinstein types, etc. That many people would dismiss (and still do) UNTIL they see for themselves.

You're also accurate about the globalists not being shy about their plans, consider that this has been the case at least for decades. How many people have become aware of this type of information compared to pre-Q / Trump?

Your last point about the world being run by mainly stupid people, I can't disagree. It's rather shocking how stupid some can be and still manage to keep their roles. The high level globablists are more cunning, not necessarily smarter and by thinking in longer terms is a big factor in how people can be controlled. If you tell people to plan 1 move ahead in a game of chess while you are planning your moves 3-4 moves ahead, even mistakes made can be corrected by the time it makes your opponent's radar.

[–] • 0 pt

Great response, thanks!

I will agree that Q did get a LOT of people to start looking into things. This is perhaps why the media started to jump on the Q thing at the very end. Partially they wanted to smear, but, I suspect that people higher up were worried about the JQ making it further out there than their containment efforts allowed.

Thanks for the feedback, I appreciate it.

[–] • 0 pt

Cheers, appreciate that you were actually serious in your inquiries. I don't particularly care about being mocked, but I'm also more level headed and not diving in. It was about a year into reading Q posts that it was clear that any "codes" were to be simple enough that most anyone could decipher the intent, but not the strategy.

Frankly, I do still expect that Trump will win in a new election and return to office, although I'm seeing more people trying to argue that Trump was never going to get a second term. Though at this stage all that really remains is the general faith that's got me this far "everything works out for the best in the end."